Search Results for "in-camera statements"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "in-camera statements"

79 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 79 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Orders and Inadequate Verification of In-Camera Statements. Preventive Detention Invalid as Detaining Authority Did Not Consider Bail Orders and In-Camera Statements Were Not Properly Verified Under Section 3 of MPDA Act, 1981.

30 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Abhishek Pradip Tarkase, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offende...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Detenu's Bail Status and Lack of Compelling Necessity for Preventive Detention. The court held that the detaining authority must consider the detenu's bail status and demonstrate a compelling necessity for preventive detention over ordinary law.

30 Jun 2011

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Firoz Khan alias Aabu, challenged a detention order dated 31.12.2010 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, ...

High Court

Criminal Writ Petition Allowed: Detention Order Quashed Due to Delays and Inconsistencies. Maharashtra Court Overturns Detention Under MPDA Act Citing Constitutional Violations and Non-Application of Mind by Detaining Authority

4 Jul 2024

This petition challenges the detention order dated 03/04/2024 issued under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities (MPDA) Act, 1981, and it...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and Inadequate Verification of In-Camera Statements. The court held that the detaining authority must consider bail conditions and verify in-camera statements under Section 3(4) of the MPDA Act, 1981.

26 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Lalya @ Kishor Arun Waghmare, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Non-Communication of Documents — Violation of Section 8 MPDA Act. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detenu Was Not Supplied Copies of In-Camera Statements and Bail Order, Depriving Him of Right to Make Effective Representation.

28 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Omkar Chandrashekhar Kapare, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Unreasonable Delay. Court holds that reliance on fabricated offences and lack of live link between alleged activities and detention order vitiates preventive detention.

18 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Anil s/o Ramesh Manglani, challenged a detention order dated 21.09.2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur City under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Compelling Necessity. The court held that failure to consider the petitioner's custody status and the staleness of incidents rendered the detention order invalid.

3 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Allauddin @ Nigro @ Babu Chand Sayyed, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Non-Compliance with Section 59 of Bombay Police Act, 1951 — Failure to Supply In-Camera Statements and Inadequate Notice Period Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

25 Apr 2011

The petitioner, Santosh Raghunath Patil, challenged an externment order dated 20th September 2010 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone 2,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Non-Disclosure of In-Camera Statements in Show Cause Notice — Violation of Principles of Natural Justice under Maharashtra Police Act. The Court held that failure to disclose substance of in-camera statements in show cause notice vitiates externment order as it deprives noticee of opportunity to meet the case.

25 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Sayyed Jafar Sayyed Nasir, challenged an externment order dated 23.6.2016 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Amravati City, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Detenu's Bail Status and Inadequate Verification of In-camera Statements. The court held that the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction was vitiated as it did not consider the detenu's bail status and the in-camera statements were not properly verified, violating Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act.

18 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Viki Baban Galte, challenged a preventive detention order passed on 26 April 2016 by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Section 3...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)