Search Results for "implied exclusion"

183 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 183 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Claimant's Appeal for Enhanced Compensation and Owner's Appeal Against Liability in Motor Accident Case — Negligence of Driver Proved, Owner Liable for Compensation.

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment and award dated 27.12.2010 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal & Fast Track Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in International Commercial Arbitration. Parties Impliedly Excluded Part I of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Agreeing to ICC Rules and Zambian Law.

The petitioner, Konkola Copper Mines (PLC), a company registered in Zambia, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Section 9 Jurisdiction in International Commercial Arbitration — Implied Party Finding Set Aside. Part I of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies to pre-BALCO agreements, but non-signatory cannot be treated as implied party without express consent.

The petitioners, GL Asia Mauritius II Cayman Limited and others, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 21/08/2010 passed by the District Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition in International Commercial Arbitration with Foreign Seat. Court holds that Part I of Arbitration Act, 1996 does not apply where seat of arbitration is outside India, and no interim relief can be granted under Section 9.

The petitioner, BG Strategic Advisors, LLC, a Florida corporation, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Manufacturer's Appeal in Airbag Non-Deployment Case. Non-Disclosure of Airbag Deployment Threshold Constitutes Unfair Trade Practice Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeal arose from a consumer complaint filed by Shailendra Bhatnagar against Hyundai Motor India Limited regarding non-deployment of airbags in hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice Under Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Alternative Remedy Under Section 351 Available.

The petitioner, Abdul Karim Ahmed Mansoori, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 1st August...