Search Results for "implied agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "implied agreement"

844 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 844 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Second Appeal in RERA Registration Dispute — Development Agreement Not Required to Be Registered Under Registration Act for Project Registration. The Court held that the Goa Real Estate Regulatory Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by insisting on compulsory registration of a development agreement under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, as a precondition for processing a project registration application under Sections 3 and 4 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

18 Jul 2026

The appellant, Edcon Real Estate Developers, a registered partnership firm, filed a Second Appeal under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and ...

Supreme Court

Agreement to Sell Not a Deemed Conveyance Without Transfer of Possession | Tenant’s Possession Not Sufficient | Supreme Court (2026 INSC 59)

15 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal filed by Vayyaeti Srinivasarao and set aside the judgment of the High Court, which had affirmed the Trial C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Land Development Dispute, Restoring Tribunal's Findings on Breach and Damages. The Court Clarifies Limited Scope of Judicial Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Holding that High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction in Re-evaluating Factual Determinations.

21 Apr 2025

The appeals arose from a judgment of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dated 30th April 2015, which was rendered in appeals under Section 37 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in International Commercial Dispute Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. Indian Courts Lack Supervisory Jurisdiction Over Arbitration Seated in Colombia Governed by Colombian Law.

18 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Disortho S.A.S., a Colombian company, and the respondent, Meril Life Science Private Limited, an Indian company, entered into an Inter...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Section 11 Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Seat of Arbitration Held to be Dubai, UAE, Not India, Based on Express Terms of Distributorship Agreement.

15 Nov 2024

The present petition was filed under Section 11(6)(a) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Reference Case — Licence Agreement Contained Valid Arbitration Clause for Disputes Arising from Termination and Recovery of Possession. The Court held that the arbitration clause survived termination and that the Commercial Court erred in refusing reference under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

23 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court considered appeals against a common judgment of the Gujarat High Court dismissing First Appeals filed by the appellant against order...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.

18 Jan 2022

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Distributorship Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Profits for Period Without Written Agreement. The court held that the arbitrator's finding that no implied contract existed for the period 14th June 2006 to 31st March 2007 was not perverse or against public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Diversey India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeal on Applicability of Section 9 of Arbitration Act to Foreign-Seated Arbitration. The Appeal Concerns Interim Measures in a Contract Governed by English Law with Arbitration in London.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose out of an agreement dated 20.10.2010 between Harmony Innovation Shipping Ltd. (appellant) and Gupta Coal India Ltd. (first responden...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)