Search Results for "hyper technical mistake"

61 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 61 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Petition to Dismiss Corrupt Employee Despite Minor Wage Deduction. Serious misconduct of diverting octroi refund and receiving illegal gratification outweighs technical non-compliance under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, challenged the judgment and order dated 7 May 2010 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs. 3,00,100/- for Electronic Stamps Purchased Under Wrong Scheme Code. Mistake of Law Does Not Bar Refund When Stamps Not Used and No Unjust Enrichment.

The petitioner, Manjeet Singh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a refund of stamp duty paid under a mistake of law. The peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Charitable Trust Against Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Filing Form 9A Under Section 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961. CBDT Circulars Must Be Liberally Construed to Grant Relief When Delay Is Due to Change in Procedure from Manual to Electronic Filing.

The petitioner, Nav Chetna Charitable Trust, is a trust registered under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and runs educational institutions. F...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Claimant in Motor Vehicle Accident Case on Territorial Jurisdiction Grounds. Territorial Jurisdiction Objection Overruled as Procedural Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Following Precedent in Malati Sardar v. National Insurance Company Ltd.

The appeal arose from a motor vehicle accident where the appellant's son died after being hit by a tractor driven recklessly by the first respondent. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance Due to Typographical Error in Date of Agreement. Correction of Date Does Not Change Nature of Suit and Is Necessary for Determining Real Controversy Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

The petitioner, plaintiff in a suit for specific performance (O.S. No. 132 of 2010) before the II Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Vijayapura, filed a writ p...