Search Results for "hammer blow"

18 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Hariomdas Govinddas Bainade, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for offences punishable under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 309 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Hariomdas Govinddas Bainade, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for offences punishable under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubt Over Cause of Death. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Establish Hammer Blow as Cause of Death, and Eye Witness Testimony Was Contradictory.

The appellant, Satish Suresh Shrisundar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No.200/2014 on 29.12.2016 for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bail Appeal in SC/ST Act Case Due to Absence of Prima Facie Intent to Humiliate on Caste Basis. Appellant's Role in Assault with Knife Not Accompanied by Casteist Abuses, and Co-accused's Alleged Utterances Not Attributed to Appellant.

The appellant, Pratik Satish Lokhande, filed an appeal under Section 14A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convicted Murderer Under Section 302 IPC. Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction for Murder.

The appellant, Subhash Shamrao Gaikwad, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the offence of murder under Section 302 of the India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Father-Son Duo in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Sakharam, a 20-year-old man, who was in a love affair with Jyotsna, the daughter of appellant No.1 (Laxman) and sis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused of Murder in Hammer Attack Case Due to Inconsistent Medical Evidence. Death Caused by Multiple Injuries, Not Solely by Appellant's Blow, Leading to Benefit of Doubt.

The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal of Karuppanna Gounder, who was convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder. The case arose from a land disp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Acquittal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Complainant Fails to Prove Debt or Liability Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Concurrent findings of acquittal upheld as presumption under Section 139 of NI Act was rebutted by accused's probable defence.

The applicant, Rais Ahmad Mohammad Kasmi Siddiqui, filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging t...