Search Results for "gratuity forfeiture"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "gratuity forfeiture"

55 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 55 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Employer's Writ Petitions Against Gratuity Orders Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The Court upheld the Controlling and Appellate Authorities' decisions, finding no error in adjudicating delayed applications or in calculating gratuity based on basic wages and dearness allowance, as the employer's deposit of admitted amount waived delay objections and special allowance was not part of statutory wages.

7 Mar 2026

The dispute involved multiple writ petitions filed by an employer company and several employees concerning gratuity payments under the Payment of Grat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award to Compulsorily Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Requires Willful Offence or Moral Turpitude, Not Mere Misconduct.

4 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires proof of financial loss caused by employee's misconduct, not merely disciplinary punishment of compulsory retirement.

4 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Right to Gratuity in Pending Criminal Appeals Under Kerala Service Rules. Interpretation of Rules 3 and 3A of Kerala Service Rules Distinguishes Pension from Death-cum-Retirement Gratuity, Prohibiting Withholding Despite Conviction with Suspended Sentence.

15 Mar 2022

The Supreme Court examined appeals arising from a Full Bench judgment of the Kerala High Court concerning the entitlement of government employees to D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Forfeiture of Gratuity for Misappropriation by Bank Employee — Wilful Misconduct Under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Justifies Forfeiture of Entire Gratuity. The court held that misappropriation of funds by a bank employee constitutes wilful misconduct involving moral turpitude, and the employer is entitled to forfeit the entire gratuity under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

14 Jun 2018

The petitioner, an ex-employee of the respondent bank, was terminated on 6 July 1996 after a departmental enquiry found him guilty of misappropriating...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award — Delay in Filing Application Not Barred Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Limitation Under Section 7(7) Applies Only to Appeals, Not to Original Applications for Gratuity.

26 Feb 2015

The petitioners, the Maharashtra State Cooperative Tribal Development Corporation Ltd. and its officers, challenged the order of the Controlling Autho...

High Court

High Court Allows Bank's Petition to Forfeit Gratuity of Employee Terminated for Misappropriation. Misappropriation of Funds by Bank Employee Constitutes Offence Involving Moral Turpitude Under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Justifying Forfeiture of Entire Gratuity.

18 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Bank of India, challenged the orders of the controlling authority dated 30 June 2004 and the appellate authority dated 4 September 200...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity and Leave Encashment to Resigned Government Employees — Distinguishes Resignation from Voluntary Retirement Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and Maharashtra Civil Services Rules. Resignation after 10 years of service qualifies for gratuity under Section 4 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and Rule 66(3) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1981 is invalid for denying leave encashment on resignation.

20 Jun 2014

The Bombay High Court, in a group of three writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, considered the challenge by government emplo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Gratuity Dispute — Holds That Dismissal for Disorderly Behaviour Under Model Standing Orders 22(a) and 22(l) Constitutes 'Disorderly Conduct' Under Section 4(6)(b)(i) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Disentitling Employee to Gratuity.

14 Feb 2011

The petitioner, Jaya Hind Industries Ltd., employed the respondent, Vilas Vithalrao Takale, as a Clerk. Two charge sheets were issued to the responden...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim in Payment of Gratuity Act Case — Resignation Not Ground for Forfeiture. Forfeiture of gratuity under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires termination for misconduct causing damage; resignation does not justify forfeiture.

11 Mar 2005

The petitioner, H. Jayarama Shetty, joined the respondent Sangli Bank Ltd. on 28 May 1991. On 3 May 1994, a show cause notice was issued regarding irr...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)