Search Results for "government service removal"

1737 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1737 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows State's Appeal, Upholds Removal of Agricultural Officer for 17-Month Unauthorised Absence. Disciplinary Authority's Quantum of Punishment Not Interfered With as Misconduct Was Grave and Procedure Was Fair.

The case involves a Writ Appeal filed by the State of Tamil Nadu against an order of a Single Judge of the Madras High Court in WP No. 9440 of 2012 da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Pension Claim of Removed Teacher Under Rule 101 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Distinction Between Removal and Dismissal Determines Eligibility for Compassionate Pension.

The petitioner, Nalini Shende, was appointed as a temporary teacher at Smt. Jankidevi Jaiswal Prathmik Vidyalaya, Nagpur, and was granted permanency f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Medical Student on Medical Grounds — Directs Reinstatement and Waives Bond Amount. Polysubstance Dependence Not a Ground for Termination Under Code of Conduct; Student Willing to Undergo Treatment.

The petitioner, Arashdeep Singh, a student at Armed Forces Medical College, Pune since 1999, was removed from service with effect from 9th June 2004 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of CISF Constable Challenging Removal from Service for Unauthorized Absence. Disciplinary Authority's Order of Removal Upheld as Not Disproportionate to Misconduct of Absence Without Leave for Over 8 Months.

The petitioner, a constable in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), was removed from service by an order dated 7th May 2012 issued by the Com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement Order of Government Servant Under Rule 165-A as Not Dismissal and Not Requiring Compliance with Article 311(2) of the Constitution. Compulsory Retirement Order Upheld as Valid Under Rule 165-A, Service Rules Not Violative of Article 311(2).

The case involved a government servant who was compulsorily retired from service under Rule 165-A of the Bombay Civil Services Rules, as applicable to...