Search Results for "goonda"

44 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 44 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order in Habeas Corpus Petition for Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards Under Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. Failure to Communicate Grounds of Detention in Language Known to Detenue Renders Detention Unlawful.

The petitioner, Dil Shad, wife of Huseen Kabeer, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Telangana Offenders Act Case — Lack of Proximate Link Between Past Crimes and Public Order Disturbance. Single Pending Murder Case Insufficient to Justify 'Goonda' Detention When Bail Already Granted and No Charge-Sheet Filed.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and quashed the preventive detention order against Khaja Bilal Ahmed, who was detained under the Telangana Preven...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Detention Order in Goonda Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Detaining Authority's Reliance on Irrelevant Bail Order Without Similar Facts Vitiated Subjective Satisfaction Under Section 2(f) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Karishma Kapoor, wife of the detenu Sai Sudhahar @ Sudhahar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Goonda Detention Case Due to Non-Communication of Arrest Grounds and Lack of Public Order Impact. Preventive Detention Order Quashed as Alleged Acts Only Amount to Law and Order Issue, Not Public Order, Under Section 2(f) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Palanivel Rajan @ PTR Vinoth, was detained as a 'Goonda' under Section 2(f) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 by an order dated 17.09.2025 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Right to Representation and Mechanical Confirmation. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Section 8 of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985 Was Not Communicated, Rendering Detention Illegal.

The writ petition was filed by Smt. Prathiba Talapati, wife of the detenu Sri. Dawood Nadaf, challenging the preventive detention order dated 03.06.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Non-Communication of Documents — Violation of Section 8 MPDA Act. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detenu Was Not Supplied Copies of In-Camera Statements and Bail Order, Depriving Him of Right to Make Effective Representation.

The petitioner, Omkar Chandrashekhar Kapare, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Quashed as Live and Proximate Link Between Arrest and Detention Order Was Snapped.

The petitioner, Sumathi, mother of the detenu Dhanushkumar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...