Search Results for "generic recitals"

5 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Easement Rights Dispute Over Pathway — Vendor Cannot Confer Exclusive Right After Prior Grant of Access. Section 48 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 applied to prioritize earlier right of way over later exclusive grant.

The case involves a dispute over a pathway in Chennai. The original owner, C.L. Rajasekaran, owned a large parcel of land on Mowbrays Road. He sold po...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in 1992 Riots Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Delayed FIR. Conviction under Section 326 IPC for causing grievous hurt with dangerous weapon set aside as identification parade was not conducted and FIR was lodged 10 days after incident.

The appellant, Abdul Gani Kamruddin Mulla, was convicted by the Sessions Court for offences under Sections 326 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order for Property Linked to Narcotics Trafficking. Burden of Proof Under Section 7 SAFEMA Not Discharged by Claimant.

The petitioner, Imperial Exim (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 31 March 2011 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Third Party Claim in Execution Proceedings — ING Bank N.V. Fails to Prove Ownership of Attached Flat. Claim under Section 47 CPC and Order XXI Rules 58 and 64 rejected as bank did not establish that the flat was not owned by judgment debtor.

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by ING Bank N.V., a third party, under Section 47 read with Order XXI Rules 58 and 64 of the Code of Civ...