Search Results for "formulations"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "formulations"

86 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 86 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Drug Price Control Demand Against Pharmaceutical Company. Cream Vs. Ointment Distinction and Small Scale Industry Exemption Under DPCO 1995 Considered.

23 Dec 2016

The writ petition arose from a dispute concerning the drug price control regime under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995 (DPCO 1995). The first pet...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Drug Price Fixation Notifications for Frusemide and Theophylline Formulations. Price Fixation Under DPCO 1995 is a Legislative Exercise and Does Not Require Individual Hearing.

15 Nov 2019

The appeals by special leave challenged the decision of the Allahabad High Court which had rejected writ petitions filed by the appellants, M/s T.C. H...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging NPPA's Interpretation of DPCO 2013 — Price Ceiling Applicable Only to Formulations in First Schedule. The court held that NPPA cannot impose price ceiling on non-scheduled formulations under DPCO 2013, as the order's language is clear and unambiguous.

10 Apr 2026

The petitioners, M/s. Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. and the Indian Drug Manufacturers Association (IDMA), challenged the interpretation and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Marketer in Weights and Measures Case — Manufacturer Already Convicted and Fined for Non-Declaration of Retail Sale Price Under Packaged Commodities Rules, 1977.

5 Dec 2006

The applicants, Colgate Palmolive India Ltd. and others, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sun Pharma's Trademark Infringement Suit Against Sanofi's METOSAN, Finding No Deceptive Similarity with METOSARTAN. The marks are phonetically and visually distinct, and the products differ in composition, negating likelihood of confusion.

24 Oct 2016

The plaintiff, Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against The Madras Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi Indi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Interim Injunction Application in Trademark Infringement Suit Over Descriptive Mark 'OCTRIDE'. Court holds that the mark is descriptive of the active ingredient Octreotide and lacks distinctiveness, and balance of convenience favors the defendant.

4 May 2026

The plaintiff, Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited, filed a commercial IP suit seeking an interim injunction to restrain the defendant, United Biotech Pri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case Involving Pharmaceutical Marks LOX and XYLOX. Court finds prima facie that Defendants' XYLOX marks are deceptively similar to Plaintiff's LOX family of marks, and that the defence of common origin or acquiescence is not made out.

16 Sep 2014

The Plaintiff, Neon Laboratories Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Themis Medicare Ltd. (Defendant No. 1) and Ciro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement Suit Over STIMULIV vs STIMULET. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Despite Differences in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Therapeutic Use.

1 Mar 2021

The dispute involves two pharmaceutical companies: Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff) and Corona Remedies Pvt Ltd (Defendant). The Plai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Over Pharmaceutical Marks OROFER and OROFER-XT vs COROFER and COROFER-XT. Court finds deceptive similarity and rejects acquiescence defense under Section 33 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

10 Sep 2014

The Plaintiff, Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Corona Remedies Pvt. Ltd., alleging that t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Appeal Against Denial of Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Passing Off Dispute, Holding No Prima Facie Case or Balance of Convenience. Phonetic Similarity of 'CHYMTRAL FORTE' to 'CHYMORAL FORTE' Insufficient for Interim Relief Where Drugs are Schedule H Prescription Medicines and Public Interest Favors Affordable Pricing.

17 Nov 2017

The dispute arose from Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited's claim that Wockhardt Limited and East African (India) Remedies Pvt. Ltd. were passing off the...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)