Search Results for "foreclosure suit"

69 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 69 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Withdrawal of Section 11 Petition Does Not Bar Fresh Application Under IBC. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Not Applicable to Arbitration Petitions; Section 9 IBC and Section 11 Arbitration Act Seek Different Reliefs.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had appointed a sole arbitra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Second Appeal in Property Ownership Dispute. Plaintiff's Ownership Upheld Based on Concurrent Findings of Fact Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the Union of India and other defendants against the judgment of the appellate court which declared the resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Leave Under Clause XII of Letters Patent, 1865 for Partition Suit Involving Immovable Property Outside Jurisdiction. Part of Cause of Action Within Jurisdiction Sufficient to Confer Jurisdiction Over Entire Suit.

The plaintiff, Jaspal Sawhney, filed a petition seeking leave under Clause XII of the Letters Patent, 1865 to file a suit (L) No. 494 of 2014 against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Foreclosure of Contracts for Space Under Flyovers by MSRDC. Contractual Termination Upheld Due to Breach of Terms and Public Interest.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by contractors challenging the foreclosure of contracts by the Maharashtra State Road Development ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appeal and Dismisses Foreclosure Suit Due to Improper Joinder and Limitation Bar. Court Reverses High Court's Addition of Plaintiffs and Defendants Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC as the Added Parties' Claims Were Time-Barred Under Section 22 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908.

The dispute arose from a mortgage executed in 1934 in the former State of Hyderabad. The mortgage amount became due in 1943. The first respondent, cla...