Search Results for "eye-witness identification"

316 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 316 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeals Against Conviction for Dacoity and Impersonation. Identification of Accused Through Test Identification Parades and Recoveries of Stolen Property Scrutinized Under Sections 395, 397, 170, 342 IPC.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard five criminal appeals filed by seven appellants against their conviction and sentence imposed by the Addi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Identification and Lack of Corroborative Evidence. Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt and Identification Process Was Flawed.

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Udayakumar (A-2) against his conviction for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The appellan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 143, 147, 148, 447, 302 read with 149 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony was inconsistent and not supported by other evidence.

The case involves a criminal appeal against conviction for murder and other offences. The appellants were convicted by the trial court for offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Train Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony was inconsistent and not supported by other evidence.

The appellant, Santosh Changu Karnekar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Niphad, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. The sole eyewitness identification was not credible and circumstantial evidence was insufficient to sustain conviction under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Raju Willson Pawda @ Kalya Raju, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for the murder of Babu Sampat Munnaswa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony was inconsistent and not supported by other evidence.

The appellant, Aiwan Sonaji Ranshur, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Benefit of Doubt Extended Where Sole Eyewitness Testimony Was Inconsistent and Medical Evidence Did Not Match Ocular Version Under Section 302 IPC.

The case pertains to the death of Mandeep Kumar on 21.10.2018 following an alleged attack by seven masked persons. The appellant, was identified as on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as identification of helmeted assailant at night was doubtful and circumstantial evidence insufficient.

The appellant, Mayuresh Ajit Gambhir, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the murder of Sachin Suresh Tavde on 13 Augus...