Search Results for "export for repairs"

18 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Part Regarding Computation of Deduction Under Section 80HHC of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Receipts from Hire of Barges, Proceeds of Services, Repairs of Vessels, and Extraction Charges Held Part of Total Turnover for Export Deduction.

The appellant, Sesa Goa Ltd., is a company engaged in the business of mining and export of iron ore. For the assessment year 1996-1997, the appellant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Excise Duty Case — Licensee Liable for Duty on Liquor Destroyed in Fire. Absolute liability under Rule 7(11)(a) of UP Bottling of Foreign Liquor Rules, 1969 and Rules 708/709 of UP Excise Manual; act of God no defense.

The case arises from a fire incident on 10.04.2003 at the godown of the respondent company, a distillery licensee, which destroyed 35,642 cases of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee in Income Tax Appeal Over TDS Disallowance. Disallowance of Rs. 57,11,625 upheld under Section 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act, 1961 as assessee failed to deduct tax at source on payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 per goods receipt to truck operators under Section 194C.

The dispute arose from an income tax assessment for the year 2005-2006 involving Shree Choudhary Transport Company, a partnership firm engaged in tran...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excise Duty Paid on Exported Goods Under Mistake of Law — Rule 13 Export Bond Not Used. Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law is Recoverable and Limitation Under Section 11B Central Excise Act Does Not Apply to Mistake of Law Claims.

The petitioners, Tata SSL Ltd. and its director, exported consignments of Cold Rolled Sheets and Coils to Nepal by road. The goods were cleared from t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Release of Contractual Payment Due to Disputed Facts. Court holds that disputed questions of fact regarding work completion and measurement cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M/s. GVPR Engineers Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction in the nat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Challenge to Majority Arbitral Award in Insurance Dispute — JSW Steel Ltd. v. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. — Challenge to Rejection of Claims Under Fire, Marine, and Business Interruption Policies Dismissed as No Patent Illegality Found.

The Petitioner, JSW Steel Ltd., engaged in steel manufacturing, had insured its plant at Toranagallu, Karnataka, under five insurance policies issued ...