Search Results for "entertainment tax"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "entertainment tax"

106 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 106 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council Against Levy of Entertainment Duty on Business Exhibitions. Business-to-business trade shows with restricted entry are not 'entertainment' under Section 2(5) of the Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923, and no duty is leviable under Sections 3 and 4(2).

4 Mar 2013

The Petitioner, The Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council, a company incorporated under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956, organizes annual b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Members' Club Against Entertainment Duty Demand on Billiards Tables. Principle of Mutuality and Absence of Admission Fee Render Levy Under Section 3 of Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act, 1963 Inapplicable.

11 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Gondwana Club, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, challenged the proceedings initiated by the Entertainment Ta...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Amusement Park Duty Dispute — Concessional Rate Under Section 3(5)(a) of Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923 Not Further Reducible by Section 3(2). The court held that a general admission ticket to an amusement park does not qualify as a lump sum payment for a series of entertainments under Section 3(2), so the duty for the fourth and fifth years is 7.5%.

18 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra against the judgment of the Bombay High Court. The dispute concerned the rate ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

19 Dec 2006

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Entertainment Duty on Unutilised Service Charges Collected by Cinema Theatre Owner. Service charges collected under Section 2(b) proviso of Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923, if not fully spent, are liable to entertainment duty as part of the value of the ticket.

15 Nov 2006

The petitioner, Shri Lilachand Navalmal Shah, proprietor of Shiva Parvati Chitra Mandir, a cinema theatre in Islampur, Sangli, filed a writ petition c...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Tax Exemption Calculation Method Under Gujarat Tourism Incentive Scheme. The court held that exemption limits under the New Package Scheme of Incentives for Tourism Projects, 1995-2000, should be calculated based on tax payable, not gross receipts, as per the exemption notification dated 14.02.1997 under Section 29(1) of the Gujarat Entertainments Tax Act, 1977.

2 Feb 2023

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Gujarat High Court concerning the interpretation of tax exemption calculations under the Gujarat New Package S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Entertainment Tax Demand Against Charity Show Organizer. Show for Blind Held Exempt Under Section 7 of Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923; Recovery Barred by Limitation.

22 Dec 2016

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a common order/action by the State of Maharashtra to recover entertainment duty from the organize...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Multiplex Owners' Right to Entertainment Tax Subsidy Under Goa Scheme — State's Denial of Subsidy on Grounds of Non-Compliance with Scheme Conditions Set Aside. The court applied promissory estoppel and liberal interpretation of the Goa Entertainment Tax based Subsidy for Cinema Houses (Theatres) Scheme, 2004 to hold that multiplex owners are entitled to subsidy equal to entertainment tax paid.

12 Mar 2019

The State of Goa appealed against two judgments of the District Judge, North Goa, which directed the State to pay subsidy to multiplex owners under th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by States of Karnataka and Kerala in Lottery Tax Dispute — State Legislatures Have Competence to Tax Lotteries Under Entry 62 List II. Regulatory Entry 40 List I Does Not Bar State Taxation of Lotteries Organised by Other States.

23 Mar 2022

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the States of Karnataka and Kerala against judgments of their respective High Courts which had struck down sta...

High Court

High Court Quashes Penalty on Company Officials Under CGST Act Due to Lack of Personal Liability Evidence and Procedural Flaws. Petitioners Challenge Penalty Order for Fake Input Tax Credit Allegations

25 Feb 2026

The petitioners, employees of M/s. Shemaroo Entertainment Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order-in-original dated 1 February 2025 that i...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)