Search Results for "easement"

114 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 114 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Easement Case — Right of Way Established by Prescription. Plaintiffs' claim for easement of necessity fails due to alternative access, but right of way by prescription under Section 15 of Easements Act, 1882 is upheld based on 20 years of uninterrupted user.

The case involves a dispute over a right of way between two branches of the same family. The plaintiffs, Laxman Sagun Vaigankar and Sitabai Sitaram Va...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Easement of Necessity Over Cart Track in Partition Dispute Between Brothers. Plaintiff Granted Declaration and Mandatory Injunction for Access to Landlocked Property Under Section 13 of Indian Easements Act, 1882.

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit between two brothers, T.M. Thiruvenkatasamy (defendant) and M.Sundararajan (plaintiff), concerning f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Easement Rights Dispute Over Pathway — Vendor Cannot Confer Exclusive Right After Prior Grant of Access. Section 48 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 applied to prioritize earlier right of way over later exclusive grant.

The case involves a dispute over a pathway in Chennai. The original owner, C.L. Rajasekaran, owned a large parcel of land on Mowbrays Road. He sold po...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance and Easement Case — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Right of Way. Court holds that permissive user does not create easement of necessity or prescriptive easement under Indian Easements Act, 1882.

The appellant, Smt. Shalini Laxman Wadnerkar, as the sole surviving legal representative of the original plaintiff G.G. Suvarnapathak, appealed agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Easement of Necessity Case — Plaintiff Entitled to Use Disputed Way Despite Earlier Withdrawn Suit. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Does Not Bar Fresh Suit When Subject Matter Differs and Withdrawal Was Without Liberty.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for declaration of easement of necessity and injunction concerning a disputed way over Survey No...