Search Results for "drug license"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "drug license"

98 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 98 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Manufacturer in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case — Sale to Another Manufacturer for Further Processing Not a Contravention. The Court held that sale of Nitrous Oxide I.P. by a licensed manufacturer to another manufacturer for further manufacturing does not violate Section 18(a)(vi) read with Rule 65(5)(1)(b) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, as the definition of 'manufacture' under Section 3(f) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 includes repacking and refilling.

28 Jan 2025

The present appeal arises from a criminal complaint filed by the Drugs Inspector, Kadapa, against several accused, including the appellants (Accused N...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Heinz India and GSK, Classifies Nycil Prickly Heat Powder as Medicated Talcum Powder Under Sales Tax Acts. Product Held Not to Be Medicine Despite Medicinal Properties Due to Specific Statutory Entries Including Medicated Talcum Powder Under Entry 127 of KGST Act and Toilet Powder Under Entry 1(iii) of TNGST Act.

4 May 2023

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals concerning the classification of Nycil Prickly Heat Powder under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (KGST Act...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Manufacturer in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-Cognizance Notice Requirement. Failure to Provide 10-Day Notice Under Section 18-A of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Before Filing Complaint Renders Issuance of Process Invalid.

31 Mar 2023

The petitioners, who are the Director, Managing Director, and the manufacturing company (M/s. Shree Umiya Surgical Pvt. Ltd.), challenged the order of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers to Three-Judge Bench the Question Whether Quantity of Mixture or Pure Drug Content Determines Punishment Under NDPS Act. The Court Held That E. Micheal Raj Requires Reconsideration as It Omitted Note 2 of Notification and the Scheme of the Act Treating Preparations as a Whole.

22 Apr 2020

The Supreme Court, in a reference arising from multiple appeals and writ petitions, considered the correctness of the decision in E. Micheal Raj v. In...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Division Bench Order Allowing Biosimilar Launch Without Biosimilarity Claim — Remands to High Court for Fresh Consideration of Interim Relief in Drug Regulatory Dispute

17 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal against an interim order of the Delhi High Court Division Bench dated 18.09.2019. The dispute involved M/s ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Notification Restricting Oxytocin Manufacture to Public Sector. Notification under Section 26A of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 held invalid for being arbitrary and disproportionate to the objective of curbing misuse.

22 Aug 2019

The case involves a challenge to a notification issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Issued Against Drug Manufacturers in Complaint Under Drugs and Cosmetics Act — Lack of Sanction and Invalid Complaint. Complaint filed by Drugs Inspector without prior sanction of the Drug Controller under Section 32 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, and without proper investigation, held to be invalid and liable to be quashed.

29 Oct 2018

The petitioners, AFD Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Angle French Drugs & Industries Ltd., and their directors, filed two criminal writ petitions under S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Under Drugs & Cosmetics Act Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Sanction — Secondary Evidence Order Set Aside. The court held that delay of over 22 years in trial violates Article 21 and absence of valid sanction under Section 20 of the Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940 renders prosecution invalid.

5 May 2016

The applicant, Kailash S/o Mannalal Jindal, was the original accused No. 1 in Criminal Case No. 57/1994 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bayer's Challenge to Compulsory License for Nexavar Under Section 84 of Patents Act, 1970. Court Holds That Patentee's Import of Drug at High Price Does Not Satisfy Reasonable Requirements of Public or Constitute Working of Invention in India.

15 Jul 2014

The petitioner, Bayer Corporation, a US-based pharmaceutical company, held a patent for the drug Sorafenib Tosylate, sold under the brand name Nexavar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Applications for Cancellation of Bail in NDPS Case — No Supervening Circumstances or Misuse of Bail Established. The court held that cancellation of bail requires higher threshold such as interference with investigation or tampering of evidence, and mere disagreement with the trial court's order is not sufficient under Section 439(2) of CrPC.

17 Feb 2011

The Union of India filed multiple applications under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking cancellation of bail granted to si...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)