Search Results for "distinct commercial commodity"

133 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 133 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Monsanto's Petition on Seed Supply as Sale, Allows Subway's Petition on Franchise as Service. Court Holds That Impregnated Seed Supply is Sale of Goods Under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, While Franchise Agreement is Not a Deemed Sale of Intellectual Property Rights.

The Bombay High Court adjudicated two writ petitions tagged together, raising the common issue of whether certain transactions were liable to service ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Duty Exemption Case — Crude Degummed Soyabean Oil Not an Agricultural Product Under Notification No. 53/2003-Cus. Nexus Between Imported and Exported Products Established Under DFCE Scheme.

The appellant, Noble Resources and Trading India Private Limited (formerly Andagro Services Pvt. Ltd.), a government-recognized two-star export house,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Against Service Tax on Seed Supply and Allows Writ Against Sales Tax on Franchise Agreement. Technology-Embedded Seed Supply Held to Be a Sale Under MVAT Act, While Franchise Licensing Held to Be a Service Under Finance Act.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard together two writ petitions concerning the tax characterisation of commercial transactions under the serv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeal in Trade Tax Exemption Case Under U.P. Trade Tax Act. Exemption Denied as New Product Not Considered Different in Nature Under Diversification Scheme Under Section 4-A(5) of U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948.

The dispute arose from an appeal by a manufacturer against the denial of trade tax exemption under Section 4-A(5) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

SUIT (L) NO. 204 OF 2017.

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision That Ice Cream Is Not 'Sweet and Sweetmeats' Under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Ice cream is a distinct commodity not covered by Notification Entry 374 for reduced tax rate under Schedule Entry C-II-35(1).

The case concerns M/s. Vadilal Dairy International Ltd., a registered dealer and manufacturer of ice cream under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows State Appeal in VAT Classification Dispute — Vegit-Aloo Hara Bara Kebab Held Not a Vegetable Product. Classification under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 depends on predominant ingredient and common parlance, not processing method.

The State of Karnataka filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act challenging the order of a learned Single Judge in Writ Pet...