Search Results for "deferral"

44 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 44 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows JSW Steel's Challenge to Electricity Duty Demand on Captive Consumption. Held that electricity generated from captive power plant and consumed for own use is not 'sold' and thus not exigible to electricity duty under the Bombay Electricity Duty Act, 1958.

The petitioner, M/s. JSW Steel Limited, a company engaged in steel manufacturing, operates a captive power plant (CPP) at its factory in Raigad, Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Criminal Petition, Quashes Trial Court Order Rejecting Deferment of Cross-Examination Under Section 231(2) Cr.P.C. -- Accused in IPC Offences Including Section 302 Granted Relief to Prevent Prejudice in Defence Disclosure

The petitioners, accused in a sessions case involving grave offences under the IPC, sought deferment of cross-examination of witnesses under Section 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deferment of Cross-Examination in Sessions Case for Lack of Reasons Under Section 231(2) CrPC. Court holds that discretion to defer cross-examination must be exercised with reasons and not arbitrarily.

The petitioner, Pradip Kundlikrao Kute, challenged an order dated 01.04.2022 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Basmathnagar in Sessions Case No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Sales Tax Exemption Dispute Under Karnataka Industrial Policy. Industrial Policy 1996-2001 Does Not Cover Purchase Tax Under Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by M/s High Range Coffee Curing Pvt. Ltd. against the State of Karnataka and others, challenging the High Court's ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Challenge to Assessment Order Restricting Sales Tax Incentives under Package Scheme of Incentives, 1993. Expansion Unit Seeks Quashing of Order Alleging It Is Without Jurisdiction and Contrary to Scheme Terms.

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of automobiles and spare parts, filed a writ petition befor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Discriminatory Sales Tax Rules Under Article 226. Held that Rule 31B and Rule 31AA of the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 operate in different contexts and do not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, M/s Graphite India Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High C...