Search Results for "defective application"

1165 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1165 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Discharge Application in Cheque Dishonour Case — Defect in Complaint Verification Curable. Procedural Defect Not Fatal Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The present application was filed by the original accused, Rajabhau Shankar Nagare, challenging the order dated 01.08.2018 passed by the learned Judic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Price of Goods Allegedly Defective. The Court held that the defendant's claim of defective goods raised a triable issue, entitling it to unconditional leave to defend under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The Petitioner, Minda Vast Access System Private Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal of Operational Creditor in Insolvency Case Due to Defective Demand Notice and Limitation Bar. Section 9 Application Under I&B Code Fails as Date of Default is Later Than Demand Notice and Invoices are Time-Barred.

The Appellant, M/s. Metals and Metal Electric Private Limited, an operational creditor, filed an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Ban...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Despite Defective Arbitration Clause in Work Orders. Court Holds That Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, It Can Appoint Sole Arbitrator When Arbitration Agreement Is Invalid Due to Lack of Mechanism for Third Arbitrator.

The Applicant, Voltas Limited, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of a sole ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Application in MSMED Act Arbitration. Court Holds That Section 34 Application Is Maintainable and Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) Applies.

The appellant, M/s. Ravindranath GE Medicate Associate Private Limited, issued a work order dated 9th January 2008 to the respondent, M/s. Clean Coats...