Search Results for "decoy check"

5 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to two criminal appeals filed by the original accused against the judgment and order of conviction passed by the learned Additional ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness's testimony lacked corroboration.

The appellant, Pravinbhai Ambalal Shah, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge & Special Judge, Kheda at Nadiad in Special Case No. 5 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Railway Employee for Overcharging Decoy Passenger in Disciplinary Proceedings. Central Administrative Tribunal's Order of Reinstatement Set Aside as Disciplinary Authority's Discretion Not Vitiated by Non-Supply of Enquiry Report.

The case involves a disciplinary action against a railway employee, Moni Shankar, who was a Booking Supervisor. He was appointed as a Trains Clerk in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Prosecution's Case Fails: Appellant Acquitted of Bribery Charges. Inconsistencies and Lack of Evidence Lead to Appellant's Acquittal in High-Profile Bribery Case

The prosecution failed to substantiate the charge under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d)(i) and (ii) of the Act against the appellant (AO1). The evidence did n...