Search Results for "deceptively similar mark"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "deceptively similar mark"

165 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 165 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trademark Infringement Suit by Bristol Bakery Against Grupo Bimbo for 'Bimbo' Mark, Finding No Deceptive Similarity. The court held that the marks 'Bristol' and 'Bimbo' are not deceptively similar and that the defendant had prior rights, thereby refusing interim injunction and granting injunction in favor of the defendant.

6 Jul 2026

The judgment concerns two cross-suits between Bristol Bakery (plaintiff in one suit) and Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. DE C.V. and its affiliates (defendants in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Registered Trademark 'SACU-V' for Heart Failure Drug Protected Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'SACV' for Same Composition Pharmaceutical Product.

3 Sep 2024

The Plaintiff, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., is engaged in manufacturing and sale of pharmaceutical preparations. It adopted the trademark 'SACU-V' i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Use of 'RPG' Mark by Defendants in Passing Off and Trade Mark Infringement Suit. The court held that the Defendants' use of 'RPG' as a prominent feature in their trade name was deceptively similar to the Plaintiff's registered marks under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and likely to cause confusion.

21 Mar 2022

The Plaintiff, RPG Enterprises Limited, a multi-industry Indian conglomerate, filed a suit against the Defendants, Riju Ghoshal and Poulami Ghoshal, f...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case Under Trade Marks Act, 1999. Registered Trademark 'RENAISSANCE' Found Infringed by 'SAI RENAISSANCE' Due to Deceptive Similarity and Transborder Reputation Under Section 29(4).

19 Jan 2022

The appeal arose from a trademark infringement dispute between an appellant-plaintiff, a global hotel chain incorporated in Delaware, USA, and respond...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion in Trade Mark Infringement Case Involving Use of Registered Mark as Corporate Name for Dissimilar Goods. The Full Bench overruled Raymond Ltd v Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and held that Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides a separate cause of action for infringement when a registered trade mark is used as a corporate or trading name, even for dissimilar goods.

1 Mar 2017

The case involves a Notice of Motion in a suit filed by CIPLA Limited against M/s. CIPLA Industries Private Limited and Vishal Khanna for alleged infr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Eris Lifesciences in Trademark Infringement Case. Phonetic Similarity Between 'NEBISTAR' and 'NEBISTOL' Leads to Restraint Order Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

23 Dec 2015

The Plaintiff, Lupin Limited, filed a suit alleging that the Defendants, Eris Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd. and others, were infringing its registered tradem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Trademark Infringement and Passing Off in Beer Product Dispute. Plaintiff's registered trademark 'HAYWARDS 5000' held to be deceptively similar to Defendant's 'COX 5001', warranting protection pending trial.

6 Feb 2014

The plaintiff, Sabmiller India Limited, filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction against the defendant, Jagpin Breweries Ltd., for infringing its r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'EVANOVA' vs 'ECONOVA' for Pharmaceutical Products. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Under Section 29 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

21 Jan 2014

The Plaintiff, Charak Pharma Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant fr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case: 'ROFOL' vs 'PROFOL'. Prior Registration of 'ROFOL' by Plaintiff in 1992 Entitles Injunction Against Defendant's Deceptively Similar Mark 'PROFOL' Under Section 29 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

31 Mar 2012

The plaintiff, M/s. Neon Laboratories Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, M/s. Medical Technologies Ltd. an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against 'ULTRA TUFF' Cement for Infringing 'ULTRATECH CEMENT' Trademark and Passing Off. The court held that the mark 'ULTRA TUFF' is deceptively similar to the registered trademark 'ULTRATECH CEMENT The Engineer's Choice' under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and restrained the defendants from using the mark.

28 Jun 2011

The plaintiff, Ultra Tech Cement Limited, filed a suit alleging that the defendants, Alaknanda Cement Pvt. Ltd. and another, were infringing its regis...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)