Search Results for "de-notification"

25 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Challenge Land Acquisition After Preliminary Notification – Karnataka High Court | Arkavathi Layout Case

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order/report dated 23.02.2023 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Contempt Petition and Writ Petitions in Land Acquisition Dispute — No Willful Disobedience Found. Court held that the acquisition proceedings under the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 were valid and the petitioner failed to establish contempt.

The case involves a contempt petition (CCC No. 655/2023) filed by Chamundeshwari Nagara Sarvodaya Sangha against Sri Dinesh Kumar, Commissioner of Mys...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Approves Compensation Scheme for Tribal Landowners in Coal Mining Acquisition - Mahanadi Coalfields Directed to Pay Compensation for Lands Acquired in 1987-1989. Market value determined as of 2010 survey date due to 28-year delay in compensation.

The case concerns the long-pending compensation claims of landowners, predominantly tribal communities, whose lands were acquired for coal mining by M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Cooperative Housing Society Challenging Land Acquisition for Vasant Kunj Scheme. Land Acquisition Proceedings Upheld Despite Policy Preference for Cooperative Societies.

The case pertains to land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Government of NCT of Delhi for the Vasant Kunj residential scheme. A notification u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaint Rejection Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The court held that only plaint averments are relevant for rejection and limitation is a mixed question of fact.

The appellant, as plaintiff, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 26.11.1984 executed by A. Gundappa in respect of four...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA's Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of No Prima Facie Title. BDA Failed to Establish Ownership Over Suit Property as Revenue Records Showed Private Ownership, and No Acquisition Proceedings Were Proven.

The judgment arises from two connected Regular First Appeals filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and dec...