Search Results for "cut-off marks"

31 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 31 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Challenging Minimum Qualifying Marks in Judicial Appointments: Upholding Constitutional Integrity Exploring the Constitutionality of Viva Voce Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat District Judiciary Selection Processes

The constitutionality of rules prescribing minimum qualifying marks in the viva voce test for appointments to the District Judiciary in Bihar and Guja...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Arbitrary Cut-Off Marks in Screening Test for Junior Scale Officer Recruitment. Rule 10 of Goa Civil Service Rules, 2016 Requires Objective Criteria; Commission's Discretion Must Be Exercised Reasonably.

The petitioners, who applied for the post of Junior Scale Officer in the Goa Civil Services, challenged the action of the Goa Public Service Commissio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Temporary Employees Challenging Termination. Court holds that temporary employees have no right to continue beyond contractual period and termination without notice is valid under terms of appointment.

The petitioners, Vishnu Balaji Dhumal and others, were appointed as temporary employees (process servers, peons, etc.) in the Bombay High Court and su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Selection of Anganwadi Workers in Satara District. Selection Process Upheld as Valid Under Maharashtra Anganwadi Workers Recruitment Rules, 2012.

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by unsuccessful candidates challenging the selection of Anganwadi workers (Bal Sevika) by the Jilh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit by 'VOGUE' Magazine Owner Against 'JUST IN VOGUE' Retail Services. Well-Known Mark 'VOGUE' Protected Against Use for Dissimilar Services Under Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiffs, Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. and its subsidiary, are the proprietors and users of the trademark 'VOGUE' in respect of magazines a...