Search Results for "cut-off mark"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "cut-off mark"

16 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals and Directs Separate Cut-Off Marks for Persons with Disabilities in Judicial Services Recruitment. The Court held that exclusion of visually impaired candidates from judicial services is unconstitutional and that PwBD candidates are entitled to relaxation of selection criteria under Section 34 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.

10 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu writ petition and connected matters, addressed the issue of recruitment of persons with disabilities (PwD) i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Administrative Resolution on Judicial Promotions Under Haryana Superior Judicial Service Rules 2007. The Court Held That the High Court Could Prescribe Separate Minimum Marks in Written Test and Viva Voce Through Administrative Resolution Under Article 235 of the Constitution, as It Supplemented the Statutory Rules to Ensure Merit-Based Assessment.

13 Feb 2024

The dispute arose from a batch of appeals challenging a judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court regarding the appointment of thirteen in-service...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Resolution in District Judge Recruitment Due to Illegal Alteration of Selection Criteria. Full Court's Imposition of 50% Aggregate Marks Requirement After Selection Process Violates Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service (Recruitment, Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2001 and Advertised Terms, Rendering Resolution Invalid.

1 Feb 2024

The dispute centered on the legality of the selection process for District Judge Cadre in Jharkhand initiated in 2022. The High Court of Jharkhand pub...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Appointees in Drug Inspector Selection Case, Reversing High Court's Quashing of Appointments. The Court found no arbitrariness or illegality in the recast eligibility criteria, selection committee composition, or viva-voce marks allocation under the Jammu and Kashmir Subordinate Services Recruitment Rules, 1992, and reinstated the 2009 appointments.

28 Mar 2023

The dispute arose from the selection process conducted on 8 September 2009 for appointing drug inspectors in Jammu and Kashmir, resulting in the appoi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows JPSC to Fix Cut-off Marks for Paper III in SLET Eligibility Test. Moderation Committee Empowered to Determine Qualifying Standards Post-Examination Under UGC Scheme.

18 Dec 2019

The Jharkhand Public Service Commission (JPSC) issued an advertisement on 19.07.2006 for the Jharkhand Eligibility Test (JET), a State Level Eligibili...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows MCD's Appeal in Teacher Recruitment Dispute — DSSSB's Discretion to Fix Minimum Qualifying Marks Upheld. The Court held that the selection board's power to set cutoff marks for qualitative selection is valid and not arbitrary, reversing the High Court's order to appoint candidates who failed to meet the cutoff.

1 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) against the order of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Selection of Anganwadi Workers in Satara District. Selection Process Upheld as Valid Under Maharashtra Anganwadi Workers Recruitment Rules, 2012.

12 Mar 2019

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by unsuccessful candidates challenging the selection of Anganwadi workers (Bal Sevika) by the Jilh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Temporary Employees Challenging Termination. Court holds that temporary employees have no right to continue beyond contractual period and termination without notice is valid under terms of appointment.

19 Sep 2018

The petitioners, Vishnu Balaji Dhumal and others, were appointed as temporary employees (process servers, peons, etc.) in the Bombay High Court and su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit by 'VOGUE' Magazine Owner Against 'JUST IN VOGUE' Retail Services. Well-Known Mark 'VOGUE' Protected Against Use for Dissimilar Services Under Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

19 Sep 2016

The Plaintiffs, Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. and its subsidiary, are the proprietors and users of the trademark 'VOGUE' in respect of magazines a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging CLAT 2015 Answer Key, Upholds Expert Committee's Discretion. Court declines to interfere with model answers and results of Common Law Admission Test 2015, holding that judicial review of academic decisions is limited unless there is patent error or mala fides.

2 Jul 2015

The petitioner, a student who appeared for the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) 2015, challenged the model answers published by the respondent No.1 (t...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)