Search Results for "curative petition"

16 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Summary Judgment in Recovery Suit Against DDA for Refund of Sale Consideration After Land Acquisition Lapses. The Court held that DDA cannot retain the money after failing to convey title due to lapsing of acquisition, and the suit was within limitation.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the Delhi High Court's order dismissing the appellant's application for summary judgment under Order XIII...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Headline Court Revises Compensation for Acquired Land in Village Chhalera Bangar. Enhanced Compensation Reflects Fair and Balanced Estimation Based on Land Potential and Market Conditions

The compensation for land acquired in Village Chhalera Bangar for industrial development. The court analyzed various factors such as the characteristi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Maintenance Rights for Divorced Muslim Women: Balancing Secular and Personal Laws. Court Affirms Applicability of Section 125 CrPC alongside the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, Ensuring Comprehensive Support for Divorced Muslim Women.

The appeal concerns the High Court of Telangana's modification of interim maintenance from INR 20,000 to INR 10,000 payable by the appellant to the re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Registrar's Refusal to Register Curative Petitions in Interest on Delayed Payments Act Case. Curative Petitions Cannot Be Entertained When Review Petitions Are Dismissed in Open Court, Not by Circulation, Under Supreme Court Rules, 2013.

The dispute originated from the maintainability of a suit under the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeals in Service Law Dispute Over Employee Seniority and Promotion. The Court upheld the High Court's direction to consider the employee's seniority from his promotion date in the original authority, finding the State's revisions arbitrary under service rules.

The dispute arose from the seniority and promotion claims of the first respondent, who was appointed as Sub-Engineer in Special Area Development Autho...