Search Results for "creditors' voluntary liquidation"

51 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 51 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Workman's Appeal on Distribution of Company Assets in Liquidation. Holds that Secured Creditors Have Pari Passu Charge Only Over Properties Specifically Charged, Not All Assets; Workmen Have Priority for Uncharged Properties Under Sections 529 and 529A Companies Act, 1956.

The dispute arose from the winding up of U.M.I. Special Steel Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The company became sick, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Order in Insolvency Resolution Plan Approval Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Resolution Plan Found Compliant with Section 30(2) and Binding on All Stakeholders Despite Pending Creditor Claim Challenges.

The appeal arose under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against a judgment dated 4 January 2021 of the National Company Law App...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision on Mandatory 75% Voting Share for Resolution Plan Approval Under I&B Code. Financial Creditors' Rejection of Resolution Plan for Kamineni Steel & Power India Pvt. Ltd. and Innoventive Industries Ltd. Leads to Liquidation as Plan Did Not Garner Required Majority.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals arising from a common judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 6 September 2018,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay examines Official Liquidator’s report for declaration of sub-lease executed by lessee as void. The matter involves sub-lease of company property during pendency of winding up, with allegations of fabricated documents.

The matter concerns an Official Liquidator’s report filed in the winding up of Modi Stone Limited, seeking a declaration that a sub-lease dated 20 M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Debenture Trustee's Claim for Payment from Suit Amount Held by Court Receiver in Priority Over Assignee of Decree. The court held that an assignee of a decree steps into the shoes of the assignor and cannot claim priority over the original decree holder who is a debenture trustee.

The dispute arose from a suit filed by ICICI Bank Ltd. (plaintiff) as debenture trustee for holders of 15% non-convertible debentures issued by Pal Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Permanent Stay of Winding Up of Svadeshi Mills Company Limited. Section 466 of Companies Act, 1956 does not permit stay of winding up after assets have been sold and substantial progress made in liquidation.

The case concerns an appeal against the dismissal of a company application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking a permanent stay of t...