Search Results for "contractor employee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "contractor employee"

493 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 493 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Owner of House Not Employer of Contractor Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. Owner who engaged contractor for polishing tiles held not liable as employer of deceased contractor who died while working.

14 Sep 2017

The case involves an appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, filed by the appellants (non-applicants before the Commissioner)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer-Employee Relationship Established. Appellant held liable as employer under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 for death of employees; insurance company directed to pay and recover from appellant.

9 Jan 2015

The case involves two appeals filed by M/s. Krishnagangaa Consultants, a contractor, against the order of the Commissioner under the Workmen's Compens...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Insurer in Employees' Compensation Act Claim; Holds Principal Employer Liable for Contractor's Employee. Insurance Company's Challenge to Compensation Award Rejected as the Employee Was Engaged by Contractor for Principal Employer's Work, Making Principal Employer Liable Under the Act.

5 Apr 2013

The dispute arose from an appeal under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 filed by the insurer, United India Assurance Co. Ltd., agai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Employer in ESI Contribution Dispute - Contractor's Employees for Construction and Maintenance Not 'Employees' Under Section 2(9) of ESI Act. The court held that work of construction and maintenance of buildings is not incidental to or connected with the manufacturing process of the factory, thus contractor's employees are not covered under the ESI Act.

2 May 2006

The appellant, Bajaj Tempo Limited, a public limited company engaged in manufacturing commercial vehicles, challenged an order dated 26.11.1990 passed...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Appeals by Contractor Challenging Workmen's Compensation Awards. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Contractual Arrangement with Principal Employer.

9 Jan 2015

The case involves two first appeals filed by M/s. Krishnagangaa Consultants, a contractor, against the orders of the Commissioner under the Workmen's ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Central Government Industrial Tribunal Award Directing Regularization of Contract Labour at Hindustan Petroleum Refinery. The Court examines whether contract workers engaged through licensed contractors should be absorbed as permanent employees under notifications under Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970.

4 Mar 2010

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.2, Mumbai, which direct...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award Declaring Contract Labour as Direct Employees. Contracts for supply of labour found to be sham and bogus, workmen held entitled to direct employment with all benefits under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

6 Jun 2018

The petitioner, M/s Prabha Engineering Pvt. Ltd., an engineering company manufacturing automobile parts, challenged an award of the Industrial Tribuna...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Principal Employer in Contract Labour Dispute — No Automatic Absorption Without Section 10 Notification or Sham Contract Finding. Contract Labourers Cannot Be Deemed Employees of Principal Employer Under CLRA Act Absent Prohibition Notification or Evidence of Sham Contract.

5 Dec 2022

The case involves an appeal by Kirloskar Brothers Limited (the principal employer) against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court which upheld ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Industrial Court's Order Granting Permanency to Contract Labourers. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Contractor Deployment Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

29 Jan 2016

The petitioner, M/s Uni Klinger Ltd., challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Ahmednagar dated 28.08.2003, which allowed complaints filed by ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement of Contract Workers in BHEL Case — Contract Labour Arrangement Held Sham Due to Direct Control and Supervision by Principal Employer. The Court affirmed that workmen performing identical duties under BHEL's supervision were entitled to reinstatement without backwages under the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves appeals by Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. (BHEL) against a judgment of the Uttarakhand High Court dismissing its writ petition challe...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)