Search Results for "consumer forum"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "consumer forum"

315 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 315 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Financier's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Hire-Purchase Repossession — Held That Financier Is Not a 'Service Provider' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for Repossession of Vehicle on Default. The court ruled that repossession of a vehicle under a hire-purchase agreement after default is a contractual right and not a deficiency in service.

1 Jan 2019

The appeal arose from a consumer dispute where the respondent, Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, had entered into a hire-purchase agreement with the appellant, M/s...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Holds that Taking Insurance Policy for Commercial Premises is for Commercial Purpose, Excluding Complainant from Definition of 'Consumer' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court ruled that a commercial entity taking fire insurance policy for its business premises is not a 'consumer' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Act, as the policy is taken for commercial purpose.

13 Apr 2023

The present appeals by special leave assail the judgment and order dated 3rd December, 2004 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (Na...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Union and State in Consumer Protection Rules Challenge, Reversing High Court's Striking Down of Qualification and Procedure Provisions. Rules 3(2)(b), 4(2)(c), and 6(9) of Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office, resignation and removal of President and Members of State Commission and District Commission) Rules, 2020 Found Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of Constitution of India, as They Provide Sufficient Guidelines for Appointments to Consumer Commissions.

3 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court addressed appeals by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Union of India, and State of Maharashtra against a common judgment and order ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Protection Case, Reversing NCDRC's Dismissal on Consumer Status. Overdraft Facility Availed by Stockbroker for Business Qualifies as Consumer Service Under Exception for Self-Employment Livelihood in Section 2(1)(d)(ii) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

22 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissing a consumer complaint on the ground that the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Directors Not in Charge of Day-to-Day Operations Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Specific Allegations.

13 Sep 2019

The petitioners, who were directors of Shri Sainath Nagri Sahakari Path Sanstha Ltd. (a cooperative bank), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of ...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Appeal Seeking Substitution of Director in Consumer Execution Proceedings During CIRP. Moratorium under Section 14 of IBC does not bar substitution of director as the corporate debtor remains liable.

23 Jun 2025

The case involves an appeal filed by Sudheschandra Gupta against an order dated 01.10.2021 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mahara...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Consumer Forum Jurisdiction Over Cooperative Credit Societies. Members of Managing Committees Cannot Claim Immunity from Consumer Forum Orders as Cooperative Credit Societies Provide Services for Remuneration.

3 May 2011

This group of writ petitions was filed by members of managing committees of cooperative credit societies challenging the jurisdiction of the District ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Cheque Clearing Deficiency. Bank held liable for deficiency in service under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 due to negligence in presenting cheques within validity period, with compensation awarded for loss caused by expired cheques.

15 Apr 2026

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals filed by Canara Bank against a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)