Search Results for "condonable mistake"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "condonable mistake"

20 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court quashes censure order against court employee for minor scrutiny error, holding unintentional lapse not misconduct. The Court ruled that disciplinary action under Rule 17(a) of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules requires clear proof of misconduct, and a condonable mistake in checking valuation slip does not meet that threshold.

27 Jul 2026

The writ petition was filed by a Sheristadar working in the Principal District Court, Vellore, challenging the order of punishment of censure imposed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Condonation of Delay in Filing Income Tax Return Under Section 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — CBDT Directed to Consider Petitioner's Application on Merits. The court held that the CBDT must consider the application for condonation of delay on its own merits and not reject it without proper consideration.

18 Jul 2023

The petitioner, a joint venture between M/s R. K. Madhani & Co. and M/s Prakash Engineers & Infraprojects Private Limited, was engaged in executing pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay in Review Petition by Zilla Parishad — Unexplained Delay of 3 Years and 3 Months Not Condonable. Local Self-Government's Clumsy Decision-Making Process Not Sufficient Cause for Inordinate Delay.

20 Nov 2025

The judgment concerns a Civil Application filed by the Chief Executive Officer, Education Officer (Primary), and Chief Account Officer of Zilla Parish...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Rejecting Condonation of 856-Day Delay in Filing Appeal Against Decree on Admission. Petitioner's Withdrawal of Timely Appeal and Subsequent Delay Not Justified as Sufficient Cause Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

17 Jan 2023

The Petitioner, MSTC Limited, a Government of India Enterprise, filed a Writ Petition challenging the order dated 9 November 2022 passed by the Debt R...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Filing Section 34 Application Under Arbitration Act. Delay of 30 Days Beyond Three-Month Period Not Condonable as Per Section 34(3) Proviso.

10 Apr 2023

The appellant, Nagrik Sahakari Rugnalaya and Research Center Limited, a cooperative society, challenged an arbitral award dated 10.11.2021 passed by t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award Challenge as Barred by Limitation — Section 4 of Limitation Act Does Not Extend 30-Day Condonable Period Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration Act When It Expires During Court Vacation. The Court held that Section 4 of the Limitation Act applies only to the 3-month prescribed period, not to the 30-day condonable period under the proviso to Section 34(3), and Section 10 of the General Clauses Act is inapplicable.

1 Jan 2025

The case involves an appeal by My Preferred Trans Formation & Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. and another against M/s Faridabad Implements Pvt. Ltd. arising fro...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Filing Arbitration Application Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Dispute Centers on Whether Limitation Runs from Original Award or Belated Correction Order When Section 33 Application Filed Beyond 30 Days.

15 Jul 2022

The writ petitions challenged the order of the Commercial Court condoning the delay in filing arbitration suits under Section 34 of the Arbitration an...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows State Appeal Against Acquittal in Theft and Public Property Damage Case — Defective Investigation Cannot Be Sole Ground for Acquittal. Trial Court Must Appreciate Evidence Dehors Investigation Defects to Determine if Case is Made Out Against Accused.

8 Nov 2006

The State of Goa appealed against the acquittal of Dadasaheb Rane, a market inspector of Bicholim Municipal Council (BMC), who was charged with theft ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Advance Stamp Duty Paid on Unexecuted Deed of Assignment — Petitioner Entitled to Refund Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as No Instrument Was Executed

5 Jun 2023

The Petitioner, Kasthmandup Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 01....

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Rejecting Condonation of Delay in Customs and Central Excise Appeals; Directs Fresh Consideration. Appellate Authorities Failed to Exclude Time Taken in Prosecuting Writ Petitions Before Filing Statutory Appeals, as Required Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.

24 Dec 2014

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. The lead petition, WP N...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)