Search Results for "compensatory fee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "compensatory fee"

33 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 33 result(s)

Supreme Court

Court Rules on Bar Council Enrolment Fees: Balancing Statutory Limits and Practical Necessities. Ensuring Accessibility and Fairness in Legal Profession Entry While Addressing Operational Costs

30 Jul 2024

The judgment addresses the issue of whether the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils (SBCs) exceed the statutory limits set by Section 24(1)(f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 234E of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Levy of Fee for Late Filing of TDS Returns is Valid. The Court held that the fee under Section 234E is compensatory in nature and not a penalty, and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

9 Feb 2015

The petitioners, a practising Chartered Accountant and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition for Unascertained Damages Claim — Lock-in Period License Fee Not a Debt Under Companies Act, 1956. Claim for balance license fee after premature vacation is a claim for damages requiring adjudication, not a debt due and payable under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

28 Feb 2014

The petitioning-creditor, Indiabulls Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, against ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition Challenging Election on Ground of Office of Profit — Chairman of Goa Khadi and Village Industries Board Not an Office of Profit Under Article 191(1)(a) of Constitution. The court held that the Board is a statutory body with independent funds and the Chairman's honorarium does not constitute profit.

27 May 2005

The petitioner, an unsuccessful candidate in the 2002 Goa Legislative Assembly election for the Siolim constituency, filed an election petition under ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Violation of Ridge Protection Order — No Wilful Disobedience Found as DDA Sought Prior Approval and Court Subsequently Permitted Road Construction. The Court held that the 09.05.1996 order did not create an absolute bar on development but required prior approval from Ridge Management Board and Central Empowered Committee, which was obtained.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court dismissed a contempt petition filed by Bindu Kapurea alleging wilful disobedience of the Court's order dated 09.05.1996 in MC Mehta ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Zilla Parishad Councilor for Office of Profit — Secretary of Watershed Committee Not an Office of Profit Under Section 16(1)(h) of Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. The court held that the position of Secretary of a Watershed Management Committee with an honorarium of Rs.3,000 per month does not constitute an office of profit under the Act.

31 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Bhagwat Digambarrao Uphad, was elected as a Councilor of the Zilla Parishad. Respondent No.6, Vikram Hanumantrao Uphad, filed an appli...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Traders' Challenge to Market Fee Levy Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 — Fees Held Valid for Services Rendered by APMC. The court upheld the show cause notice demanding payment of fees for market services, rejecting the contention that the fee was not for services rendered to each licensee.

1 Feb 2005

The petitioners, who are traders in agricultural produce and licence holders within the market area of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Financier's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Hire-Purchase Repossession — Held That Financier Is Not a 'Service Provider' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for Repossession of Vehicle on Default. The court ruled that repossession of a vehicle under a hire-purchase agreement after default is a contractual right and not a deficiency in service.

1 Jan 2019

The appeal arose from a consumer dispute where the respondent, Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, had entered into a hire-purchase agreement with the appellant, M/s...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case, Reinstates Proceedings Quashed by High Court. Parallel Prosecutions Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Other Offences Are Permissible, and Settlement Agreement Does Not Extinguish Liability Unless Full Payment Is Made.

8 Oct 2021

The dispute arose from dishonoured cheques issued by Aanchal Cement Limited (ACL) to Gimpex Private Limited. Gimpex had paid customs duty and wharfage...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Compensation for Delayed Possession in Fiesta Homes Project. The Supreme Court mandates compensation for homebuyers, correcting NCDRC's oversight of the construction agreement's possession date.

22 Jul 2024

The appellants, along with proforma respondents, filed a complaint against the first respondent-builder for delay in handing over possession of flats ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)