Search Results for "collateral challenge"

254 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 254 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Bombay Tenancy Act Case — Certificate of Purchase Under Section 32M Cannot Be Challenged After 9 Years. The Court Held That the Certificate Is Conclusive and the Landlord Cannot Seek Termination of Tenancy After the Tenant Has Purchased the Land.

The case involves a dispute under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding agricultural land bearing Gat No. 98 in village Tilleha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute Over Sale Deed Validity — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court Held That No Substantial Question of Law Arises When Findings Are Based on Appreciation of Evidence and Are Not Perverse.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute. The appellants, Rambhau Maroti Fating and others, and M/s L.G. Developers & Buil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Revenue Authorities in Stamp Duty Dispute — Security-cum-Mortgage Bond for Guaranteeing Third-Party Loan is Collateral Security Under Article 40(c) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, Not a Mortgage Deed Under Article 40(a).

The present Letters Patent Appeal was filed by the Joint District Registrar and Collector of Stamps, Nagpur, and the Chief Controlling Revenue Authori...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Decree of Specific Performance and Mesne Profits. Notarized but Unregistered Agreement to Sell Held Void Under Registration Act, 1908.

The present appeal was filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 challenging the judgment and decree dated 08.05.2024 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Upholds Award as Not Suffering from Patent Illegality or Being Against Public Policy, Refusing to Reappreciate Evidence.

The petitioner, Angel Capital & Debt Market Limited, a stock broker, challenged an arbitral award dated 16 May 2009 under Section 34 of the Arbitratio...