Search Results for "co-accused witness"

143 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 143 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Tutored Child Witness. High Court's Reversal of Conviction Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Foundational Facts for Section 106 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, Balveer Singh, who was originally convicted by the trial court f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Robbery Case — Conviction Under Section 397 IPC Set Aside as Firearm Not Actually Used. Robbery Under Section 392 IPC Upheld Based on Credible Testimony and Recovery of Stolen Property.

The appellant, Ram Ratan, was convicted by the Special Judge under the MPDVPK Act, 1981, Sheopur, for offences under Sections 392 and 397 of the India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Circumstantial Evidence Case Due to Unreliable Last Seen Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302/364/392/394/201 IPC set aside as chain of circumstances was incomplete.

The appellant, Dinesh Kumar, along with co-accused Mange Ram, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jagadhri, Haryana, for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Disclosure Statement and Lack of Corroborative Evidence. Conviction under Sections 392 and 397 IPC Set Aside as Recovery of Common Articles and Hostile Witnesses Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appeal arose from a robbery case where the appellant was convicted under Sections 392 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) by the Trial Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in Kidnapping and Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. The court upheld life imprisonment under Section 364A IPC for kidnapping for ransom, relying on last seen evidence and recovery of victim's belongings despite non-recovery of dead body.

The appellant, Sanjay Rajak, was convicted under Section 364A IPC for kidnapping a 5-6 year old child for ransom and sentenced to life imprisonment. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Cancels Bail of Accused in Tiger Poaching Case Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 — Accused Found to Be Financier and Key Link in Transnational Wildlife Trafficking.

The State of Maharashtra (Forest Department) filed an application under Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking cancellation of ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder in Club Rivalry Case — Knife Attack on Complainant Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Appellant's Conviction Under Section 307 IPC Sustained as Medical and Eyewitness Evidence Corroborated Intent to Cause Death.

The appellant, Dnyaneshwar Gangadhar, was convicted under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code for attempting to murder Ranjit Patil (PW8) on 7 March ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused No.9 in Murder Case for Lack of Evidence of Criminal Conspiracy. The court held that mere suspicion or association is not enough to frame a charge under Section 120B IPC; there must be some material showing an agreement to commit the offence.

The applicant, Shashikant R. Kulkarni, was accused No.9 in Sessions Case No.27/2010 arising out of C.R. No.I220/2006 registered at Kalamboli police st...