Search Results for "clarificatory circular"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "clarificatory circular"

76 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 76 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Transfer Order of Government Officer in Town Planning Department — Upholds State's Power of Transfer as an Incident of Service. Transfer Order Issued in Public Interest and Not Vitiated by Malafides or Violation of Statutory Rules.

16 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Shri Noreshwar Raghunathrao Shende, was serving as Director of Town Planning, Maharashtra State, Pune. He was transferred to the post ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Duty Drawback Case — Holds Clarificatory Circular Retrospective. Circular No. 35/2010-Cus. dated 17.09.2010, being clarificatory and benevolent, applies retrospectively to exports made prior to its effective date, and the customs component of AIR duty drawback is available even if excise rebate availed.

1 Jan 2025

The appellant, M/s Suraj Impex (India) Pvt. Ltd., a merchant exporter of Soyabean Meal, claimed All Industry Rate (AIR) duty drawback at 1% under Cust...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Classification of Plant Growth Promoters as Excisable Goods Under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Products Containing NPK as Essential Constituent Classified as 'Other Fertilizers' Under Note 6 Chapter 3105, Attracting 1% Duty.

29 Aug 2018

The petitioners, Dharti Agro Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and its director, challenged an order dated 8 March 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise...

High Court

High Court Quashes GST Appellate Order Against Indian Oil Corporation for Violation of Natural Justice — Pre-deposit Requirement Set Aside. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Reasoned Order Renders Appellate Order Unsustainable Under Section 107(11) of CGST Act, 2017.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioner, M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., a public sector undertaking engaged in storage and supply of petroleum products, filed a writ petitio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Denial of Advance Authorization Benefits for Export of Pharmaceutical Products. Court holds that denial of benefits under Para 4.1.5 of Foreign Trade Policy on ground of non-fulfillment of condition of minimum value addition is unsustainable as the condition was not applicable to the product in question.

1 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Sandoz Private Limited and Lupin Limited, are pharmaceutical companies engaged in the manufacture and export of pharmaceutical produc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Denial of Advance Authorization Benefits for Export of Pharmaceutical Products. Court holds that the condition of 'direct physical handling' of goods by the applicant is not a mandatory requirement under the Foreign Trade Policy and that the Policy does not prohibit third-party procurement or supply.

1 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Sandoz Private Limited and Lupin Limited, are pharmaceutical companies engaged in the manufacture and export of pharmaceutical produc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Sales Tax Reimbursement Dispute — Clarifies That Sales Tax on Works Contracts Is Levied on Goods Component, Not on Completed Items of Work. Clause 45.2 of GCC Does Not Apply When Tax Is on Transfer of Property in Goods Involved in Works Contract.

5 Jun 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Orissa against the judgment of the Orissa High Court. The dispute arose from works contract...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Compassionate Appointment Claims for Municipal Employees Under Specific Circulars. The court held that Circular Nos. 301-Emp., 302-Emp., and 303-Emp. under the West Bengal Regulation of Recruitment in State Government Establishments and Establishments of Public Undertakings, Statutory Bodies, Government Companies and Local Authorities Act, 1999, provide a scheme for compassionate appointments in municipalities, and applications must be considered accordingly, distinguishing municipal employees from State Government employees.

27 Apr 2025

The appeal arose from a batch of cases concerning compassionate appointment claims by heirs of deceased employees of Burdwan, Ranaghat, and Habra Muni...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)