Search Results for "civic amenity"

22 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Change of Land Use for Cement Plant in Sangrur Due to Violation of Master Plan and Environmental Norms Under PRTPD Act and Pollution Control Regulations

The Supreme Court heard civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) and writ petitions challenging a Change of Land Use (CLU) granted fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Cancellation of Allotment for Non-Construction of School Building Within Stipulated Period. Conditional Sale Deed Rescinded Due to Failure to Fulfill Condition Precedent of Construction Within 5 Years.

The appellant, M/S Divyajyothi Vidya Kendra, a society registered under the Karnataka Society Registration Act, 1960, was allotted a civic amenity sit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order to Auction Civic Amenity Plot in Gokak. Deputy Commissioner lacks authority under Section 72 of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 to auction a site reserved for civic amenity in a private layout.

The petitioner, Mohan Vasudev Chavan, owned land bearing Survey No.134/1 in Gokak, which he converted to non-agricultural use and formed a layout of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Sale of Housing Board Site, Upholds Validity of Sale Deed and Rejects Review Petition. The court held that the petitioner lacked locus standi and the sale was validly executed by the Karnataka Housing Board in favor of the trust.

The petitioner, Mr. Adinarayanasetty, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, styled as a public interest litig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Development Charge Levy in Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the levy is a fee for services rendered and not a tax, and the amendment is within legislative competence.

The petitioners, The Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society and another, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Regiona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Illegal Construction in Residential Zone. Unauthorized construction in residential zone without valid development permission is liable for demolition under MRTP Act and BMC Act.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Sharvan Developers Private Limited and others, and by Jayesh Mehta and others, challenging a demolition ...