Search Results for "cheque bouncing"

63 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 63 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Blank Cheque Defence Rejected as Unsubstantiated. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands in favour of holder, and accused failed to rebut it by preponderance of probabilities.

The appellant, The Bagayatdar Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case, Upholds Jurisdiction Under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Bank’s Right to Choose Jurisdiction for Cheque Dishonour Cases Upheld – Transfer Denied Under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal Based on Perverse Findings. Statutory Presumption Under Sections 118(a) and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Not Rebutted by Accused Despite Admission of Cheque Issuance.

The appellant, Uttam Ram, owned an apple orchard and supplied packing materials to apple growers, including respondent Devinder Singh Hudan. In Septem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Acquittal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Complainant Fails to Prove Debt Legally Enforceable. Loan of Rs. 1,00,000 advanced by LIC agent to acquaintance not proved as legally recoverable debt under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The complainant-appellant, Sharanappa, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 N.I. Act Not Rebutted. Complainant's Failure to Prove Financial Capacity Does Not Automatically Discharge Accused When Execution of Cheque is Admitted.

The appellant/complainant filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. challenging the judgment of acquittal dated 29.12.2010 passed by the XV...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case, Reinstates Proceedings Quashed by High Court. Parallel Prosecutions Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Other Offences Are Permissible, and Settlement Agreement Does Not Extinguish Liability Unless Full Payment Is Made.

The dispute arose from dishonoured cheques issued by Aanchal Cement Limited (ACL) to Gimpex Private Limited. Gimpex had paid customs duty and wharfage...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted by accused.

The appellant, Dr. Kailash Charkha, was the original complainant in Summary Criminal Case 160 of 2004 before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Legally Enforceable Debt. Appellant failed to prove that the cheque dated 06.03.2004 was issued towards a debt or liability that existed on that date, as the liability arose only after 50 days from the contract date.

The appellant, Kala Mines and Minerals, a partnership concern, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. Accused Failed to Prove Defence That Cheque Was Issued for Different Transaction and Cash Paid.

The complainant, Stanley Barros Pereira, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against the accused, Julieta Cot...