Search Results for "charge-sheet after retirement"

142 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 142 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Transfer Order in ONGC — No Violation of Service Rules Found. Transfer order issued on administrative grounds upheld as petitioner failed to establish mala fides or breach of transfer policy.

The petitioner, Rajinder Paul Bharadwaj, was working as Manager (MM) in the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) at Mumbai. He was transferred ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Income Tax Commissioner's Petition for Full Pension and Retiral Benefits. Rule of 50% Deduction for Less Than 10 Years Qualifying Service Under Rule 49(2)(b) of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 Not Applicable to Petitioner Who Served Over 30 Years.

The petitioner, B.B. Rajendra Prasad, a retired Commissioner of Income Tax, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Central Administrati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order for Payment of Arrears of Salary to Driver Reinstated After Acquittal in Corruption Case. No Justification for Denying Full Back Wages During Intervening Period of Compulsory Retirement.

The Union of India filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 9 August 2018 in Original Applicatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Retired Judicial Officer Initiated After Acceptance of Voluntary Retirement. Disciplinary proceedings initiated after acceptance of voluntary retirement are without jurisdiction as the employer-employee relationship ceases upon retirement.

The petitioner, a retired District Judge, challenged the initiation and continuation of disciplinary proceedings against her after her request for vol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Release of Full Retirement Benefits to Retired Employee. Retirement Benefits Constitute Property Under Article 300A of Constitution of India, Cannot Be Withheld Without Legal Authority.

The petitioner, Shri Babulal Fakira Vasaikar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra and other respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Chargesheet Against Retired University Employee for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Discipline Rules. Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After Voluntary Retirement Cannot Be Sustained Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979 Without Specific Provision.

The petitioner, Manohar B. Patil, was an employee of the Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University. He applied for voluntary retirement and w...