Search Results for "central recognition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "central recognition"

795 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 795 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Village Recognition Dispute — Inter-District Boundary Dispute Not a Valid Ground to Keep Recognition in Abeyance. Formal recognition of a village cannot be withheld indefinitely pending resolution of an inter-district boundary dispute where the village has fulfilled all other criteria under the O.M. dated 22.03.1996 and O.M. dated 01.10.2005.

23 May 2025

The dispute pertains to the recognition of a village in Nagaland. The appellant, Old Jalukai Village Council, opposed the recognition of respondent no...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Regional Labour Commissioner's Order Declaring Office Bearers of Unrecognized Union as Protected Workmen Under Section 33(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Only Office Bearers of Recognized Union (Federation) Are Entitled to Protected Workmen Status; Deemed Recognition on Expiry of 15 Days Not Contemplated Under Rule 61(4) of Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957.

12 Nov 2024

The Petitioner, Tata Communications Limited, challenged an order dated 14 August 2024 passed by the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Pune, decl...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

8 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 as Valid Regulatory Legislation. High Court erred in striking down entire Act; provisions conflicting with UGC Act are severable.

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Allahabad High Court's judgment striking down the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in ISRO Drivers Association Recognition Case — Association Formed on Job Description Not a 'Distinct Category' Under Rule 5(c) of CCS (Recognition of Service Associations) Rules, 1993. The Court held that the expression 'distinct category' must be determined by the concerned Ministry/Department based on functional, administrative and organizational set up, and not merely on job description.

10 Aug 2020

The Government of India and others appealed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh which had directed the appe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Trade Union Against Industrial Tribunal Award Rejecting Reference on Ground of Non-Recognition — Matter Remanded by Supreme Court for Fresh Consideration on Merits. The Court set aside the award and directed the Tribunal to decide the reference on merits, holding that the absence of a recognised union does not bar adjudication of an industrial dispute.

18 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Hind Kamgar Sanghatana, a trade union, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an aw...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Industrial Court's Interim Orders Suspending Recognized Union's Rights for Non-Compliance with Section 19(iv) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. The court held that interim relief cannot be granted without first determining compliance with statutory requirements under Section 19(iv) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

18 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Swarajya Kamgar Sanghtana, a recognized trade union at Exide Industries Ltd., challenged two orders of the Industrial Court, Ahmednaga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Cancellation of Recognition Under Section 13 of MRTU & PULP Act — Employer Has Locus to Seek Cancellation of Union Recognition. The Court held that Section 13 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 does not restrict the right to apply for cancellation of recognition to any particular category, and the employer, being a necessary party, can maintain such an application.

26 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Association of Engineering Workers, a registered trade union under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, was granted recognition by the Industri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recognition of Trade Union Under Section 11 of MRTU & PULP Act. Membership Verification Based on Employer's Records Upheld as Proper.

9 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, challenged an order of the Industrial Court declarin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Trade Union Recognition and Election in Air India. Court upholds the validity of the recognition granted to Air India Employees Union and the election conducted under the Code of Discipline in Industry, 1958.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Air India Employees Guild and Air Corporation Employees Union challenging the recognition granted...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)