Search Results for "cease and desist"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "cease and desist"

125 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 125 result(s)

High Court

Court Rejects Continuation of Ex-Parte Ad-Interim Injunction in Logo Dispute. Plaintiff's Failure to Fully Disclose Material Facts Leads to Denial of Relief

13 Jun 2024

The principles and legal precedents regarding the continuation of ex-parte ad-interim injunctions, focusing on the Plaintiff's conduct and the necessi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Prima Facie Case and Guilty of Iniquitous Conduct. The court upheld the Single Judge's refusal of interim injunction under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Copyright Act, 1957, finding suppression of facts and lack of evidence of ownership.

6 Apr 2026

The present Commercial Appeal was filed by Laser Shaving India Pvt Ltd (the original plaintiff) against the order dated 25/06/2025 passed by the learn...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Winding Up of Mutual Fund Schemes and Interprets SEBI Regulations. The Court examined the interrelation and constitutional validity of Regulations 39 to 42 with Regulation 18(15)(c) of the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996, while deferring final adjudication pending statutory proceedings under the SEBI Act, 1992.

14 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court of India addressed civil appeals concerning the interpretation and application of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Despite Defendant's Preliminary Objections. Plaintiff's Mark 'ESSEL' Found to Have Acquired Distinctiveness and Defendant's Use Likely to Cause Confusion.

10 Mar 2016

The plaintiff, Essel Propack Ltd., filed a suit in 2010 against Essel Kitchenware Ltd. and another defendant for trademark infringement and passing of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Involving 'Kalpataru' Mark. The plaintiff, a well-known real estate developer, successfully restrained the defendants from using the mark 'Kalpataru' for their housing project, as it was deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered and well-known trademark.

9 Jun 2015

The plaintiff, Kalpataru Properties Pvt. Ltd., a builder and developer established in 1975, has used the mark 'Kalpataru' as an integral part of its c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Amendment in Commercial IP Suit Due to Delay and Lack of Due Diligence. Amendment After Commencement of Trial Not Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Plaintiffs Failed to Show They Could Not Have Raised the Matter Earlier.

30 Nov -0001

The present Interim Application No. 752 of 2024 was filed by the original plaintiffs, Ramnish Verma and Finesse Fashions Pvt. Ltd., in a pending Comme...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Competition Commission of India and Kapoor Glass in Abuse of Dominance Case — No Abuse Found in Volume Discounts and Contractual Terms by Dominant Glass Tubing Manufacturer. The court held that volume discounts are not per se abusive under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, and that the evidence did not establish anti-competitive foreclosure or refusal to supply.

30 Jun 2025

The case arises from an information filed by Kapoor Glass India Pvt. Ltd. on 25 May 2010 under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, alleging that ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Over Pharmaceutical Marks OROFER and OROFER-XT vs COROFER and COROFER-XT. Court finds deceptive similarity and rejects acquiescence defense under Section 33 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

10 Sep 2014

The Plaintiff, Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Corona Remedies Pvt. Ltd., alleging that t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Use of 'KATARIA INSURANCE' Held Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Marks 'KATARIA' and 'KATARIA INSURANCE CONSULTANCY' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

8 Dec 2025

The plaintiff, Bhavesh Suresh Kataria, proprietor of Kataria Jewellery Insurance Consultancy, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Passing Off Claim Over Domain Name 'secondshaadi.com' — Finds 'Shaadi' Generic and Descriptive. Plaintiff's mark 'Shaadi.com' lacks distinctiveness for exclusive use; no likelihood of confusion as 'secondshaadi' denotes a different service.

14 Sep 2016

The Plaintiff, People Interactive (India) Private Limited, owner of the well-known matrimonial website 'Shaadi.com', filed a suit against Vivek Pahwa ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)