Search Results for "causing hurt"

558 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 558 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioners in Food Adulteration Case — No Offence Made Out Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Sale of 'Mint' and 'Saunf' Products Not Prohibited Under Section 26(2)(i) of FSS Act, 2006 as They Are Not 'Food' as Defined.

The petitioners, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia and Vijay Banarasi Chaurasia, were engaged in the business of selling 'Mint' and 'Saunf' products. On 12th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Atrocity Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Conviction under Sections 332, 504, 506(2) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Voluntarily Causing Hurt to Deter Public Servant from Duty.

The appellant, Jadeja Mahipatsinh Dhulaji, was convicted by the learned Special Judge, Joint District Court, Patan on 01.04.2005 in Special Atrocity C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction in Robbery Case: Offence of Robbery Under Section 390 IPC Not Made Out as No Grievous Hurt Caused or Attempted. The court held that for theft to become robbery, the offender must cause or attempt to cause death or grievous hurt, and mere tying up does not suffice.

The appellant, Dudhnath @ Ajay Baburam Harijan, was convicted by the 1st Ad-hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Bombay, for offences under Sections 394, 450...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes POCSO Proceedings Against Husband and In-Laws in Matrimonial Dispute — Allegations Found to be Exaggerated and Vindictive. Court Held That Continuing Criminal Proceedings Would Amount to Abuse of Process of Law Under Section 528 BNSS.

The present criminal appeal arose from an order of the Allahabad High Court refusing to quash criminal proceedings against the appellants, who are the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Extortion Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 364A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand for Ransom.

The appellant, Lalit Vilasrao Thakare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge (V), Nagpur in Sessions Case No.78 of 2013 for offences punishab...