Search Results for "casual remarks"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "casual remarks"

37 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 37 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits appellant: No Evidence of Abetment in Suicide Case. "Justice prevails as mere disapproval of a relationship does not equate to abetment under Section 306 IPC."

21 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court quashed the charges under Section 306 IPC against the appellant, observing that mere disapproval of a relationship or casual remark...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Regularisation of Temporary Workmen in ONGC Based on Certified Standing Orders and Unfair Labour Practice Provisions. The court considers whether clause 2(ii) of ONGC's Certified Standing Orders confers a right to regularisation and whether the decision in PCLU is per incuriam.

7 Feb 2020

This batch of appeals arises from judgments of various High Courts directing regularisation of workmen employed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ON...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Permanent Secondment Case: TARs Cannot Be Considered After 2011 OM. The Court held that the Office Memorandum dated 12.05.2011 supersedes all previous instructions, including the 2004 OM that mandated TARs, and therefore TARs cannot be taken into consideration for Permanent Secondment.

2 Dec 2019

The respondent, Lt. Col. Sameer Singh, was commissioned in the Indian Army in 1994 and later posted to the Directorate General Quality Assurance (DGQA...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Grounds Were Stale and Irrelevant, Violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.

29 Jan 2018

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Ganesh Narayan Mane, challenged the detention order dated 08.09.2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Bail Application and Acquittal in Main Case Not Considered. Failure to Consider Pending Bail Application and Subsequent Acquittal in Substantive Offence Vitiated Subjective Satisfaction Under Section 3(1) of MPDA Act.

18 Nov 2016

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Sanaullah Abdul Khan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 23.12.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Pol...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Family Court Judge in Public Interest — Rule 10(4) Pension Rules Invoked Without Sufficient Material. Court holds that compulsory retirement under Rule 10(4) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 read with Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008 requires a subjective satisfaction based on relevant material, and mere pendency of disciplinary proceedings or adverse entries without a review committee recommendation cannot sustain the order.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Chitra Bhedi, was a Judge of the Family Court, Nagpur. She was compulsorily retired in public interest by an order dated 3rd Octob...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Family Court Judge in Public Interest — Rule 10(4) Pension Rules Invoked Without Sufficient Material. Court holds that compulsory retirement under Rule 10(4) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 read with Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008 requires formation of opinion based on relevant material and cannot be passed mechanically or without application of mind.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Chitra Bhedi, was a Judge of the Family Court, Nagpur. She was compulsorily retired in public interest by an order dated 3rd Octob...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Orders and Inadequate Verification of In-Camera Statements. Preventive Detention Invalid as Detaining Authority Did Not Consider Bail Orders and In-Camera Statements Were Not Properly Verified Under Section 3 of MPDA Act, 1981.

30 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Abhishek Pradip Tarkase, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offende...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Supersession of Senior Teacher for Headmistress Post. Appointment of Junior Teacher Based on Interview Without Following Seniority-Cum-Merit Under MEPS Act and Rules Held Invalid.

14 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Mahila Samiti Trust, runs an educational institution. Respondent No.1, Smt. Kiran Sham Shivnani, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses IAS Officer's Challenge to Compulsory Retirement in Public Interest. Service Record Including Adverse Entries and Minor Punishment Justified Action Under Rule 16(3) of All India Services (Death-Cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958.

12 Sep 2005

The petitioner, Paramjeet Singh Bhogal, an IAS officer of the 1967 batch allotted to Maharashtra Cadre, challenged the order of compulsory retirement ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)