Search Results for "cable television network"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "cable television network"

13 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 13 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Orders Compensation for Unauthorized Sealing of Cable Network Control Room — Police Action Without Statutory Authority Violates Fundamental Rights Under Article 19(1)(g) of Constitution of India.

1 Mar 2011

The petitioners, a partnership firm running a cable television network under the name U.S.A. Cable Networks and its members, filed a writ petition und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Classification of Hybrid Amplifier as General Electronic Item Under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 — Product Not an Accessory of Cable TV. The Court held that the Hybrid Amplifier or Line Extender is a general electronic item covered by schedule entry C-II-126, not an accessory of Cable TV under entry C-II-124.

14 Sep 2018

The case involves a Sales Tax Reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, at the instance of the Revenue (Commissioner of Sales Tax)...

High Court

High Court Upholds Entertainment Duty on APSARA Award Function; Deletes Penalty. Petitioner's challenge to entertainment duty dismissed, penalty reduced due to legal interpretation issues.

20 Jun 2024

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the order dated 28th September 2007, confirming an entertainment duty demand o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Importer in Customs Classification and Valuation Dispute — Head End Equipment Classified Under CTH 8543 8999 and Software/Service Charges Included in Assessable Value. The court upheld the Tribunal's finding that the imported goods constituted a complete functional unit and that the appellant's mis-declaration of classification and value justified penalties under Sections 112(a) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962.

27 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Indusind Media & Communications Ltd. against the order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Cancellation of MSO Permission Due to Denial of Security Clearance. Security Clearance is a Mandatory Precondition Under Rule 11C of Cable Television Network Rules, 2012.

7 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed two civil appeals arising from the cancellation of permissions granted to the appellants, Digi Cable Network (India) Pvt. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Copyright Assignment Dispute — Upholds Plaintiff's Right to Injunction Against Exploitation of Dubbing and Satellite Rights. Agreement for Assignment of Rights in Telugu Film 'BHAI' Held Valid and Binding, and Plaintiff's Payment of Consideration Creates Prima Facie Case for Temporary Injunction.

24 Sep 2014

The appeal arises from a suit filed by Goldmines Telefilms Pvt. Ltd. (plaintiff) against Reliance Big Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. (defendant No.1) and oth...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Defamatory Broadcasts by News Channel — Interim Relief Granted to Protect Reputation of Corporate Entity. Court Restrains Defendants from Airing or Publishing Defamatory Content Against Plaintiff Company Pending Trial Under Law of Defamation and Right to Reputation.

1 Dec 2014

The plaintiff, Essel Infraprojects Limited, filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from broadcasting, publishing, or c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council Against Levy of Entertainment Duty on Business Exhibitions. Business-to-business trade shows with restricted entry are not 'entertainment' under Section 2(5) of the Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923, and no duty is leviable under Sections 3 and 4(2).

4 Mar 2013

The Petitioner, The Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council, a company incorporated under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956, organizes annual b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Amusement Park Duty Dispute — Concessional Rate Under Section 3(5)(a) of Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923 Not Further Reducible by Section 3(2). The court held that a general admission ticket to an amusement park does not qualify as a lump sum payment for a series of entertainments under Section 3(2), so the duty for the fourth and fifth years is 7.5%.

18 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra against the judgment of the Bombay High Court. The dispute concerned the rate ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

19 Dec 2006

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)