Search Results for "bus conductor"

126 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits KSRTC Driver in Road Accident Case Due to Lack of Rash or Negligent Driving Evidence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Culpable Rashness or Negligence Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mohammad Hanif Jainum Khalifa, was a driver employed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC). He was tried and convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence on Overtaking — State Fails to Prove Negligence in Head-On Collision Between Two Mini Buses Under Sections 279, 337 IPC.

The State of Goa appealed against the acquittal of the accused, Mohandas S. Gawade, who was charged under Sections 279 (rash driving) and 337 (causing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Conductor in Bus Accident Case Under Section 308 IPC — No Intent to Cause Death or Grievous Hurt Established. Ringing Bell Without Checking Passenger Boarding Does Not Amount to Attempt to Commit Culpable Homicide.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal against the conviction of Abdul Ansar, a bus conductor, under Section 308 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Vehicle Accident Claim — Bus Fire Caused by Negligence of KSRTC Driver. Claimant Entitled to Compensation as Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Petition on Grounds of Non-Joinder of Driver and Lack of Negligence Evidence.

The appellant/claimant, Smt. Chandra Prabha P., filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for inj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Enhances Compensation for Death of Workman in Motor Vehicle Accident Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. The court held that the Commissioner erred in computing compensation by not properly applying the multiplier and not awarding funeral expenses and penalty for delayed payment.

The appellant, Smt. Prema, wife of the deceased K.P. Hanumantharaju, filed an appeal under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of School Bus Attendant for Repeated Penetrative Sexual Assault on 4-Year-Old Student. Failure of School Authorities to Report Offence Under POCSO Act Criticized.

The appellant, Amol Maruti Sherkar, was a bus attendant employed by Sinhgad Institute, Pune, and was convicted under Section 4 of the Protection of Ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Conductor in MSRTC Ticketless Travel Case — Reinstatement Set Aside as Punishment Not Disproportionate. The court held that the Industrial Court's revisional order restoring dismissal was not perverse and did not warrant interference under Article 227.

The petitioner, Mahadeo Shripati Khot, was a conductor employed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) since December 1988. On 31...