Search Results for "bootlegger"

126 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Stale Grounds. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Status and Delay in Passing Order Showed Lack of Live Link.

The petitioner, Laxman Sharnappa Dindore, challenged a detention order dated 21/06/2018 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Status of Detenu.

The petitioner, Suryakant @ Mukesh Laxman Dhotre, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Dru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order in Habeas Corpus Petition for Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards Under Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. Failure to Communicate Grounds of Detention in Language Known to Detenue Renders Detention Unlawful.

The petitioner, Dil Shad, wife of Huseen Kabeer, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Against Bootlegger for Lack of Material Showing Threat to Public Order. Detenue Classified as Bootlegger Under Section 2(b) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985, but No Evidence of Disturbance to Public Order or Tranquility.

The petitioner, Nasimbanu @Aapa Gulhasan Mohamdsral Kureshi, was preventively detained by an order dated 21.01.2026 passed by the Police Commissioner,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Bootlegger Due to Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish threat to public order.

The case involves a challenge to a preventive detention order dated 21.01.2026 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City, detaining Champaben ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Bootlegger Due to Lack of Material Showing Threat to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish disturbance to public order.

The petitioner, Bhimsing @ Jitu Fatesing Ravat, challenged his preventive detention order dated 07.02.2026 passed by the Police Commissioner, Vadodara...