Search Results for "bogus tenancies"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "bogus tenancies"

20 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order on Memo for Additional Issues in Suit for Partition and Injunction. Court Holds That Trial Court Erred in Rejecting Memo Without Considering Its Merits and That the Memo Was Not Barred by Res Judicata or Constructive Res Judicata.

2 Jul 2026

The petitioners, who are the plaintiffs in O.S. No.30/2007 pending before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Gowribidanur, filed a suit for partition...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahsildar's Order Cancelling Mutation Entries in Tenancy Land Dispute — Exceeds Jurisdiction Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Tahsildar Cannot Cancel Certificate Issued Under Section 38(E) of Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950, as Such Power Lies Only with Revenue Tribunal or Civil Court.

16 Oct 2025

The petitioners, legal heirs of tenants Ganpati Kundlik Kurule and Abaji Ramji Jadhav, challenged the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Tahsildar, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahsildar's Order Cancelling Mutation Entries in Tenancy Land Dispute — Held That Tahsildar Lacks Jurisdiction to Cancel Certificate Issued Under Section 38(E) of Hyderabad Tenancy Act After 65 Years Without Notice to Affected Parties. The court held that the certificate under Section 38(E) of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950 attains finality and cannot be cancelled by the Tahsildar after such a long lapse of time, and the order was passed in violation of natural justice.

16 Oct 2025

The petitioners, legal heirs of original tenants Ganpati Kundlik Kurule and Abaji Ramji Jadhav, challenged the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Ta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision Against Eviction Decrees on Grounds of Unauthorized Subletting, Bonafide Requirement, and Default in Rent Payment. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts on unauthorized subletting, bonafide requirement, and default under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 were upheld as no jurisdictional error was found.

11 Oct 2024

The dispute pertains to eviction proceedings initiated by the landlord-respondent against the tenant-petitioners in respect of a shop premises in Kolh...

High Court

High Court Rules on Unlawful Subletting: Transfer of Tenancy Disguised as Business Sale Invalid. Court highlights the misuse of tenancy rights and emphasizes protection of landlords under Bombay Rent Act.

7 Oct 2024

The Bombay High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, legal heirs, in a long-standing eviction dispute regarding unlawful subletting of commercial p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Appellate Officer's Order Under Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Act. The Judgment Text Is Truncated and Does Not Contain the Court's Final Disposition or Legal Findings.

6 Nov 2019

The Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board, a unit of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA), filed a series of eigh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Entry Mutation Based on Fraudulent Document - Petitioner's Title Upheld Over Respondent's Bogus Claim. Mutation of revenue records does not confer title; revenue authorities cannot decide title in summary proceedings under Section 149 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

6 May 2016

The petitioner, Karansing Kachrusing Kakas, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad, which confirmed th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MHADA's Surplus Area Demand in Redevelopment — Condition 22 of NOC Valid Under MHAD Act. Petitioners' Challenge to Communication Dated 6 July 2007 and Appellate Order Rejected.

19 Mar 2015

The petitioners, owners of a property admeasuring about 546 sq. mtrs. in Mumbai, sought redevelopment and obtained a No Objection Certificate (NOC) fr...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MHADA NOC for Reconstruction — Neighboring Society Failed to Prove Fraud or Infringement of Rights. NOC under DCR 33(7) for reconstruction of cessed building was valid as FSI of 2.5 did not depend on number of tenements and allegations of bogus tenancies were disputed questions of fact not suitable for writ jurisdiction.

28 Jun 2006

The dispute arose from a writ petition under Article 226 filed by a neighbouring cooperative housing society and its member challenging a No Objection...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.

17 Oct 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)