Search Results for "bogus exports"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "bogus exports"

16 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Enforcement Committee Decision in Textile Quota Fraud Case. Petitioner Found to Have Forged Visas and Fabricated Bank Realisation Certificates to Obtain Premium Quota.

4 Oct 2011

The petitioner, M/s. Minar Exports, challenged a decision of the Enforcement Committee constituted under a notification dated 12 November 1999 by the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty for FEMA Violations in Bogus Export Case — Appellant Director Held Liable for Receiving Remittances Without Actual Exports Under Sections 3(b) and 3(d) of FEMA.

28 Mar 2012

The case involves an appeal under Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) against an order of the Appellate Tribunal for Foreig...

High Court

High Court Remands Rebate Claim to Revisional Authority in Central Excise Case Due to Erroneous Assumption. Revisional Authority Allowed Rebate Despite Allegations of Fraudulent Cenvat Credit by Manufacturer.

27 Jun 2011

The Union of India filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 9 February 2010 passed by the Revisional Aut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order Under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Rejecting Settlement Application for Non-Disclosure of Full Income.

22 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Major Metals Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30 December 2010 passed by t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Excise Incentive Withdrawal Case — Policy Change Upheld as Prospective and in Public Interest. The Court held that the impugned notification was not retrospective and promissory estoppel did not bar the government from modifying the incentive scheme for Kutch industries.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Union of India against the common judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had quashed Notificatio...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Revisional Authority's Order Granting Rebate to Merchant Exporter. Rebate Claim Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 Is Independent of Manufacturer's Bogus Cenvat Credit.

28 Jun 2011

The Union of India filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order of the revisional authority under Section 35EE of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Magistrate's Summoning Order in Hawala Case — High Court's Revision Order Set Aside. Court holds that at the stage of taking cognizance under Section 190(1)(b) CrPC, the Magistrate need not record detailed reasons; sufficiency of grounds is to be assessed from the charge sheet and accompanying documents.

8 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Gujarat against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which had set aside the order of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.

28 Jul 2016

The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Upholds Addition Under Section 68 for Unexplained Share Capital. Assessee Failed to Prove Identity, Creditworthiness, and Genuineness of Investor Companies Despite Receiving Share Premium at Rs. 190 per Share.

1 Jan 2019

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Delhi High Court in an income tax appeal concerning the assessment year 2009-10. The respondent-asses...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Share Capital/Premium Case — Assessee Failed to Prove Identity, Creditworthiness, and Genuineness of Investors Under Section 68 of Income Tax Act. The onus under Section 68 is on the assessee to establish the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions; mere production of documents is insufficient when investor companies are non-existent or unresponsive.

1 Jan 2019

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Delhi High Court in an income tax appeal concerning the assessment year 2009-10. The respondent-asses...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)