Search Results for "blank promissory note"

80 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) Dismisses Defendant's Second Appeal in Promissory Note Recovery Suit — Execution Admitted, Presumption Not Rebutted. Presumption under Section 118 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted; rejection of additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC upheld.

The dispute arose from a suit for recovery of money based on a promissory note dated 25.06.2007 executed by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case — Revisional Court Cannot Reappreciate Evidence Unless Perverse. Accused failed to rebut presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 regarding legally enforceable debt.

The case arises from a private complaint filed by the complainant (since deceased, represented by legal representatives) against the accused-petitione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Money Loan Dispute — Sets Aside Appellate Court's Decree for Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. Failure to Frame Points for Determination and Lack of Proper Reappreciation of Evidence Renders First Appellate Court's Judgment Unsustainable.

The appellant-defendant filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the judgment and decree dated 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Promissory Note Recovery Suit — Appellate Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Dismissal Upheld. Defendant's Denial of Execution and Signature on Promissory Note Found Unsubstantiated; Presumption Under Section 118 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Applied.

The plaintiff-respondent filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,13,520/- based on a demand promissory note executed by the defendant-appellant on 03.04.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Consumer Complaint Against Postal Authorities in Kisan Vikas Patra Fraud Case. Postal authorities not vicariously liable for agent's fraud as payment was made to holder under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and appellants' negligence in signing instruments contributed to loss.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by Pradeep Kumar and Raj Rani against postal authorities, including the Post Master General and othe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit — Loan Repayment Claim Upheld Despite Lack of Written Agreement. Preponderance of Probabilities Favored Plaintiff as Defendant Admitted Receipt of Money but Failed to Prove Alternative Purpose.

The appellant, Mr. Manjunath S., filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment in Commercial Suit for Recovery of Loan Amount. Plaintiff entitled to decree for Rs.1.65 Crores with interest as defendant failed to raise a triable issue under Order XXXVII CPC.

The plaintiff, Tradelink Exim (India) Pvt Ltd, filed a Commercial Suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendant,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Defence of Blank Cheque Given as Security, Leading to Confirmation of Sentence Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case arises from a complaint filed by the respondent (complainant) against the petitioner (accused) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument...