Search Results for "betting cards"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "betting cards"

9 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Applicant in PMLA Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Money Laundering. The court held that mere association with a shell entity without direct evidence of laundering proceeds of crime does not constitute an offence under Section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.

5 Dec 2025

The applicant, Khilji Mohsinahmed Mustakali, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) read wi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Petition to Quash FIR Against Bookies for Offences Under Karnataka Police Act and IPC. Allegations Pertain to Unauthorized Collection of Betting Amounts and Tax Evasion Within Bangalore Turf Club Premises.

30 Apr 2024

The High Court of Karnataka heard a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by twenty-six individuals or entities (th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Gambling Case Due to Lack of Essential Ingredients of Offence Under Section 12(a) of Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887. FIR Alleging Betting on Cricket Matches with Mobile Phones and Money Did Not Disclose Gaming in Public Place or Possession of Gaming Instruments.

30 Mar 2023

The petitioners, Akshay Anant Matkar and Satish Ramchandra Botalji, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Recreation Club's Petition Declaring No License Required for Playing Skill Games. Rummy and other skill games are not gambling, and clubs do not need a license under the Licensing and Controlling of Places of Public Amusement Order.

25 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Sri Siragalli Lakshmidevi Recreation Club (R), a society registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960, filed a writ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Clarification and Declares CGST Rule 31A(3) Ultra Vires in Favor of Turf Clubs. GST Liability on Betting Amount Limited to Commission Retained, Not Entire Totalisator Collection, Under CGST Act, 2017.

2 Jun 2021

The two writ petitions were filed by Bangalore Turf Club Limited and Mysore Race Club Limited, companies conducting horse racing and facilitating bett...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Notice of Motion in Suit Challenging Suspension of Jockey by Turf Club; Challenge Based on Unreasoned Order. Domestic Tribunal Must Give Reasons for Its Decisions, Especially When Affecting Livelihood, Argues Plaintiff.

4 May 2019

The plaintiff, a jockey with over 20 years of experience, filed a suit and notice of motion challenging the order of the Board of Appeal of the Royal ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Against Dream 11 for Alleged Gambling and GST Evasion. Fantasy Sports Held to be Game of Skill, Not Gambling Under Public Gambling Act, 1867.

30 Apr 2019

The petitioner, a public-spirited advocate, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to initiate criminal prosecution against Dream 11 Fa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Gambling Case: Playing Rummy for Stakes in a Club Does Not Constitute Gambling Under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887. The court held that rummy is a game of skill, not chance, and the club's activities were recreational, not gambling.

13 Jun 2017

The petitioner, Gajendra Shivprasad Kedia, filed a criminal writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 48...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors of Housing Society in Cheque Dishonour Case — No Vicarious Liability Without Specific Role in Day-to-Day Affairs. Directors of a cooperative housing society cannot be held vicariously liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of cheques issued by the society unless they are shown to be in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business of the society at the time of the offence.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, who were Directors of a cooperative housing society, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with S...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)