Search Results for "banning order"

119 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 119 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Stays Circular Imposing Ban on Ferocious Dog Breeds; Union of India Directed to Conduct Stakeholder Consultation Before Enforcement

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by two individuals, a dog breeder and a dog owner, challenging a circular dated 12-0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Debarment of Contractor for Failure to Furnish Performance Bank Guarantee. Bank's action of debarment upheld as not arbitrary or malafide, based on contractual stipulations and due process.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Nisa Industrial Services Pvt. Ltd. and another (Petitioners) challenging the debarment of Petitioner No.1 b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Decides Writ Petition Against ONGC's Banning Order. Petitioner Challenges Three-Year Blacklisting on Grounds of Natural Justice Violation.

The petitioner, M/s J.K. Surface Coatings Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in corrosion resistant coating application, challenged a banning order dated 25...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Banning Order Issued by Public Sector Undertaking – Allegations of Blacklisting Without Proper Notice and Violation of Fundamental Rights. Petitioner Contends That Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Intention to Ban for Three Years, Rendering Order Arbitrary.

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a private limited company engaged in corrosion resistant coating applica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Ban Order Against Contractor in ONGC Project Delay Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice. Internal Enquiry Report Not Shared With Contractor Before Imposing Business Ban, Rendering Order Arbitrary and Unreasonable.

The petitioner, Sarku Engineering Services SDN BHD, a Malaysian company, challenged an order dated 4 January 2016 issued by respondent No.2, Oil and N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Ban Order Against Contractor in ONGC Project Delay Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice. Enquiry Officer's Report Not Furnished to Contractor Before Imposing Ban, Rendering Order Arbitrary and Unreasonable Under Article 14.

The petitioner, Sarku Engineering Services SDN BHD, a Malaysian company, challenged an order dated 4 January 2016 issued by Respondent No.2, Oil and N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in ONGC Blacklisting Dispute — Arbitrator Exceeded Scope of Reference. Award Directing Withdrawal of Blacklisting Letter and Restoration of Business Credibility Held Contrary to Public Policy Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challen...