Search Results for "army rules"

13 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 13 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Order Invalidating General Court Martial Proceedings Due to Improper Appointment of Judge Advocate. A Court Martial’s proceedings were declared invalid due to the improper appointment of a junior officer as Judge Advocate, contrary to legal requirements.

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, which set aside the Armed Forces Tribunal's decision to uphold the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Sentence Modification in Court-Martial Case. General Court Martial Composition Violated Army Rules, 1954, Rule 40(2) and Rule 102, but Armed Forces Tribunal's Sentencing Discretion Under Section 71(e) of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 Upheld.

The dispute arose from disciplinary proceedings against a retired Lieutenant General of the Indian Army, initiated after an anonymous complaint in 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Women Army Officers' Right to Permanent Commission in Landmark Gender Equality Judgment. Court holds that women SSC officers are entitled to PC at par with male counterparts, rejecting discriminatory service conditions.

The case concerns a batch of appeals filed by the Ministry of Defence against a Delhi High Court judgment directing the grant of Permanent Commission ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Quashing of General Court Martial Against Retired Army Officer in Procurement Irregularities Case. No Prima Facie Case Made Out as Evidence Lacked Intent to Defraud and Actions Were Within Authority's Discretion.

The Union of India appealed against the judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, which quashed the order convening a General...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Army Personnel Discharged on Four Red Ink Entries, Orders Reinstatement with Benefits. Discharge under Rule 13(3)(III)(v) of Army Rules, 1954 set aside as mechanical without considering long service and nature of minor offences.

The appellant, Narain Singh, was enrolled in the Indian Army as a Driver on 15.10.1980 and rose to the rank of Lance Dafedar. After serving for 13 yea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Army Personnel Discharged for Producing Fake Matriculation Certificate. Exoneration in Summary Court Martial Does Not Bar Discharge Proceedings Under Army Rules for Lack of Educational Qualification.

The appellant, Ex. Sepoy Surendra Singh Yadav, was enrolled in the Army on 26.04.1991. At the time of appointment, he produced a matriculation certifi...