Search Results for "areca nuts"

9 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Valuation Case — Confirms CESTAT's Finding That Transaction Value of Imported Goods Is Acceptable Under Section 14 of Customs Act, 1962. Burden of Proof on Revenue to Show Fraud or Misdeclaration Not Discharged.

The case involves four Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Port-Export), Chennai, under Section 130 of the Customs Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Sales Tax on Pan Masala and Gutkha in Multiple Appeals. State Legislatures Empowered to Levy Sales Tax on These Goods Despite Central Excise Levies, as They Are Not Declared Goods Under Section 14(ix) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from judgments of three High Courts concerning the taxability of pan masala and gutkha under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Detention Order Quashed Due to Lack of Specificity in Grounds. Court emphasizes the need for clear and specific reasons for preventive detention to uphold constitutional safeguards.

The detention order of Rakesh Ramdas Jejurkar under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act (COFEPOSA). The or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Import Restriction for Areca Nuts — Condition Requiring NOC from FSSAI Held Ultra Vires. Import Policy Condition Violates Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 of Constitution as It Lacks Statutory Authority and Is Disproportionate.

The petitioner, Siddhi Vinayak, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1913, engaged in the import of areca nuts (commonly kn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioners in Food Adulteration Case — No Offence Made Out Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Sale of 'Mint' and 'Saunf' Products Not Prohibited Under Section 26(2)(i) of FSS Act, 2006 as They Are Not 'Food' as Defined.

The petitioners, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia and Vijay Banarasi Chaurasia, were engaged in the business of selling 'Mint' and 'Saunf' products. On 12th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Husband's Challenge to Maintenance Order in Execution Proceedings — No Jurisdictional Error Found. Family Court's Inherent Powers Under Section 151 CPC Upheld to Direct Payment of ₹25,000 Per Month to Wife and Child.

The petitioner, Sri Chandrashekhara B.T., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 08.10.2021 p...